Website review, no card needed
xenoss.io website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202643 issues · 92 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on xenoss.io, 21 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 118 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
12.3 s · 2.8 MB65 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.8 MB).
Render-blocking requests
7.6 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.6 s.
Reduce unused CSS
5.6 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.6 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 13
13/100Your mobile performance score is 13 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.8 s
A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, hsappstatic.net and Google CDN and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 784 ms
784 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 784 ms of main-thread work and 1,006 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
550 ms · 139 KiB4 images could be 139 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.
hsappstatic.net adds 557 ms
557 mshsappstatic.net costs a phone 557 ms of main-thread work and 754 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 496 ms
496 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 496 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 320 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,614 HTML elements
The page has 2,614 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Hubspot adds 171 ms
171 msHubspot costs a phone 171 ms of main-thread work and 387 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 46 but mobile only 13. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.36
0.36For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.36 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s
8.1 sThe first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.4 s
18.4 sYour largest element takes 18.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “icon”.
Time to Interactive: 37.4 s
37.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 37.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.5 s
13.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.352
0.352The layout shifts by 0.352 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 41% slower for real visitors
+41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 4.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 171 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 171 requests on a phone: scripts 3.7 MB (69), stylesheets 1.3 MB (6) and images 617 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
new-home-hero-top-mob.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images in older formats
2 images (322 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 222.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (5 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (142 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 142 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 107 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
28 links with vague text
28 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
556 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 556 pages on xenoss.io and 10 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “At Xenoss, we help you develop, modernize, and integrate data stack, build AI products and tools, and adopt AI to impro…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “AI and data engineering services for enterprises”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “AI and Data Software Development Company | Xenoss.io”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://xenoss.io/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://xenoss.io/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://xenoss.io/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,323 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 86 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=27029393&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=7a6438be-4306-4574-82d0-8fe7fa4451c2&bo=1&sid=ee17e510cc2c11f193db03c246bde507&vid=ee180520cc2c11f1bb0667b17a620026&vids=1&msclkid=N>m_t.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught ecomm_pagetype value must be one of the allowed values”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,754 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,754 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact us”.
35 calls to action
The homepage has 35 calls to action, for example “Dynamic pricing systems”, “Price optimization and dynamic pricing” and “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 84 testimonial or review blocks and 10 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
56 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 56 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at xenoss.io, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on xenoss.io, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.