Website review, no card needed
yadea.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202654 issues · 75 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on yadea.com, 20 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 6.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 106 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Font display
2.2 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.2 s).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.7 MB33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
4.8 MB17 images could be 4.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 MBAbout 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 257 KiBAbout 257 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Document request latency
550 ms · 229 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
560 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 560 ms on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 344 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Server response: 660 ms
660 msYour server takes 660 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Google Fonts and others), adding 444 KiB and 398 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.6 s
7.6 sReal visitors wait 7.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 7.5 s
7.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 43.0 s
43.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 43.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 53.9 s
53.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 53.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sYour largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies for functional reasons and statistical analy…”. Most of its time is element render delay (10.1 s).
Total Blocking Time: 410 ms
410 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 410 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.7 s to 6.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.4 MB in 151 requests
13.4 MBYour homepage downloads 13.4 MB in 151 requests on a phone: images 8.8 MB (51), scripts 2.9 MB (46) and fonts 808 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 3.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
19 images in older formats
19 images (7.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
166 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example trooper_m_0d241c7a0c.jpg at 4,431 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 166 KiB.
About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit
3.81 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.81 g of CO₂e: 457.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (7 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
11 links without text
11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
30 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (27 characters)
Your title is only 27 characters: “Yadea | Electrify Your Life”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
31 links crawlers can't follow
31 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (209 characters)
Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://yadea.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at yadea.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 checks passed
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 223 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://yadea.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to set referrer policy: The value 'value' is not one of 'no-referrer', 'no-referrer-when-downgrade', 'origin', '…”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 223 words
The homepage has only about 223 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yadea.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Hosting
- Hwclouds As Ap Huawei Clouds
Company
- Founded
- 2001
- Headquarters
- Shanghai
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on yadea.com, including 22 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.