Website review, no card needed

yadea.com logo

yadea.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202654 issues · 75 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on yadea.com, 20 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.6 s5.6 sMay 16Oct 316.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.7 s
May 23, 20265.8 s
May 30, 20265.9 s
Jun 6, 20266.1 s
Jun 13, 20266.4 s
Jun 20, 20266.4 s
Jun 27, 20266.3 s
Jul 4, 20266.2 s
Jul 11, 20266.0 s
Jul 18, 20265.9 s
Jul 25, 20266.0 s
Aug 1, 20266.1 s
Aug 8, 20266.1 s
Aug 15, 20266.1 s
Aug 22, 20266.2 s
Aug 29, 20266.1 s
Sep 5, 20266.0 s
Sep 12, 20266.0 s
Sep 19, 20266.0 s
Sep 26, 20266.2 s
Oct 3, 20266.3 s
Oct 10, 20266.3 s
Oct 17, 20266.3 s
Oct 24, 20266.3 s
Oct 31, 20266.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
131 ms102 msMay 16Oct 31106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026119 ms
May 23, 2026122 ms
May 30, 2026125 ms
Jun 6, 2026126 ms
Jun 13, 2026128 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026125 ms
Jul 4, 2026124 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026120 ms
Aug 1, 2026119 ms
Aug 8, 2026118 ms
Aug 15, 2026115 ms
Aug 22, 2026113 ms
Aug 29, 2026111 ms
Sep 5, 2026109 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026106 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 2026107 ms
Oct 24, 2026106 ms
Oct 31, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of yadea.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. yadea.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  2. yadea.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  3. yadea.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  4. yadea.com at 7.5 s7.5 s
  5. yadea.com at 9.4 s9.4 s
  6. yadea.com at 11.3 s11.3 s
  7. yadea.com at 13.2 s13.2 s
  8. yadea.com at 15.1 s15.1 s

Speed

12 to fix59
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Font display

    2.2 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.2 s).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    8.7 MB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    4.8 MB

    17 images could be 4.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 257 KiB

    About 257 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    550 ms · 229 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    560 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 560 ms on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 344 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Server response: 660 ms

    660 ms

    Your server takes 660 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Google Fonts and others), adding 444 KiB and 398 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Real visitors wait 7.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 7.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 43.0 s

    43.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 43.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 53.9 s

    53.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 53.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies for functional reasons and statistical analy…”. Most of its time is element render delay (10.1 s).

  • Total Blocking Time: 410 ms

    410 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 410 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.7 s to 6.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Real visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 13.4 MB in 151 requests

    13.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.4 MB in 151 requests on a phone: images 8.8 MB (51), scripts 2.9 MB (46) and fonts 808 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 19 images in older formats

    19 images (7.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    166 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example trooper_m_0d241c7a0c.jpg at 4,431 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 166 KiB.

  • About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.81 g of CO₂e: 457.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7786
  • Images must have alternative text (7 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 6759
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Yadea | Electrify Your Life”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 31 links crawlers can't follow

    31 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (209 characters)

    Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://yadea.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at yadea.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

1 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

2 to fix42
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 223 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://yadea.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to set referrer policy: The value 'value' is not one of 'no-referrer', 'no-referrer-when-downgrade', 'origin', '…”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 223 words

    The homepage has only about 223 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yadea.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt
Hosting
Hwclouds As Ap Huawei Clouds

Company

Founded
2001
Headquarters
Shanghai

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on yadea.com, including 22 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25