Website review, no card needed

yalidine.com logo

yalidine.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202635 issues · 80 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on yalidine.com, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
149 ms131 msMay 9Oct 24143 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026136 ms
May 16, 2026136 ms
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026135 ms
Jun 6, 2026133 ms
Jun 13, 2026134 ms
Jun 20, 2026135 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026144 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026147 ms
Jul 25, 2026147 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026146 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026145 ms
Sep 5, 2026145 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026146 ms
Sep 26, 2026146 ms
Oct 3, 2026147 ms
Oct 10, 2026146 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026143 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of yalidine.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. yalidine.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. yalidine.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. yalidine.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. yalidine.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. yalidine.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. yalidine.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. yalidine.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. yalidine.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix62
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.2 s · 1.2 MB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.6 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.7 s · 407 KiB

    About 407 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.2 s · 502 KiB

    About 502 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    800 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 146 KiB

    4 images could be 146 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Google CDN adds 65 ms

    65 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 65 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, cloudflare.com and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 515 KiB and 85 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    15 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 75 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 124 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Your largest element takes 9.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.4 s

    13.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 813 ms

    813 ms

    Real visitors wait 813 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 123 ms

    123 ms

    Real visitors wait 123 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.056

    0.056

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.056, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 13 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 36 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 36 requests on a phone: scripts 711 KiB (9), other files 643 KiB (4) and stylesheets 427 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    9 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example delivery-guy-arranging-parcel-3032739-2543537.png at 620 px wide, shown at 198 px. Resized copies would save about 9 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (208 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.72 g of CO₂e: 86.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8794
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10080
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (41 characters)

    Your meta description is only 41 characters: “Le 1er de la livraison express en Algérie”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://yalidine-express.com.dz/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at yalidine-express.com.dz/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 17 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 17 pages on yalidine.com and 3 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Le 1er de la livraison express en Algérie”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Le 1er de la livraison express en Algérie”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://yalidine-express.com.dz/.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://yalidine-express.com.dz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (861 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://yalidine-express.com.dz/nos-agences and https://yalidine-express.com.dz/suivre-un-colis all use the title “Le 1er de la livraison express en Algérie”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://yalidine-express.com.dz/nos-agences and https://yalidine-express.com.dz/suivre-un-colis use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://yalidine-express.com.dz/nos-agences and https://yalidine-express.com.dz/suivre-un-colis have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://yalidine-express.com.dz/suivre-un-colis has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 internal pages checked

    We fetched 2 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 2 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 2 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 289 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 289 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yalidine.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2022.

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Hosting
Contabo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on yalidine.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25