Website review, no card needed
yettel.rs website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202655 issues · 94 checks
This review found 55 issues worth fixing on yettel.rs, 25 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 210 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 218 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 226 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 242 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.9 s
3.7 s
5.6 s
7.5 s
9.3 s
11.2 s
13.1 s
14.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.3 s · 1.7 MB62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.0 s · 435 KiBAbout 435 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 709 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 8
8/100Your mobile performance score is 8 (desktop: 27). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.7 s
A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Cookiebot and others), adding 924 KiB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.2 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
487 KiB24 images could be 487 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
2,086 HTML elements
The page has 2,086 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 240 ms
240 msYour server sent the HTML in 240 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.53
0.53For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.53 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s
11.1 sYour largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Duplo vise neta”. Most of its time is element render delay (5.7 s).
Speed Index: 20.4 s
20.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 17.2 s
17.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s
1.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.541
0.541The layout shifts by 0.541 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
47 images without width and height
47 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 242 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 147 ms
147 msReal visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 656 ms
656 msReal visitors wait 656 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.7 MB in 91 requests
2.7 MBYour homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 1.4 MB (54), scripts 1.1 MB (11) and fonts 105 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
17 images in older formats
17 images (983 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
14 images below the first screen load straight away
14 images further down the page (645 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.77 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 92.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Interactive controls must not be nested (17 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
17 tap targets too small
17 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
22 images without alt text
22 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “Privatni korisnici”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.yettel.rs/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
70 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 70 pages on yettel.rs and 13 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Yettel je prva mobilna mreža u Srbiji. Od početka komercijalnog poslovanja, 1994. godine, poverenje nam je ukazalo više…”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (535 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and /sr/privatni all use the title “Privatni korisnici”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages share a meta description
/sr/privatni/podrska, /sr/privatni, /en/consumer, /webshop/sr/Privatni-korisnici/Mobilni-telefoni, /sr/privatni/paketi-i-dodaci/mobilna and /sr/privatni/net and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 pages without an H1
/sr/privatni, /en/consumer, /sr/privatni/ponuda/aktuelno/sjajna-tv-ponuda, /webshop/sr/Privatni-korisnici/Mobilni-telefoni, /sr/privatni/paketi-i-dodaci/mobilna and /sr/privatni/ponuda/aktuelno/kupi-uredjaj-u-yettelu have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
/sr/privatni/ponuda/aktuelno/duplo-vise-neta and /sr/privatni/ponuda/tarifni-paketi/pripejd/registracija took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “lang is not defined”.
3 distorted images
3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
41 of 51 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 18 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 655 words of copy
The homepage carries about 655 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yettel.rs, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1994
- Headquarters
- Belgrade
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 55 issues on yettel.rs, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.