Website review, no card needed

yettel.rs logo

yettel.rs website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202655 issues · 94 checks

This review found 55 issues worth fixing on yettel.rs, 25 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.8 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
251 ms198 msMay 2Oct 17242 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026204 ms
May 9, 2026210 ms
May 16, 2026218 ms
May 23, 2026226 ms
May 30, 2026230 ms
Jun 6, 2026234 ms
Jun 13, 2026234 ms
Jun 20, 2026233 ms
Jun 27, 2026235 ms
Jul 4, 2026237 ms
Jul 11, 2026237 ms
Jul 18, 2026237 ms
Jul 25, 2026237 ms
Aug 1, 2026238 ms
Aug 8, 2026239 ms
Aug 15, 2026243 ms
Aug 22, 2026244 ms
Aug 29, 2026245 ms
Sep 5, 2026245 ms
Sep 12, 2026244 ms
Sep 19, 2026243 ms
Sep 26, 2026243 ms
Oct 3, 2026243 ms
Oct 10, 2026243 ms
Oct 17, 2026242 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of yettel.rs (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. yettel.rs at 1.9 s1.9 s
  2. yettel.rs at 3.7 s3.7 s
  3. yettel.rs at 5.6 s5.6 s
  4. yettel.rs at 7.5 s7.5 s
  5. yettel.rs at 9.3 s9.3 s
  6. yettel.rs at 11.2 s11.2 s
  7. yettel.rs at 13.1 s13.1 s
  8. yettel.rs at 14.9 s14.9 s

Speed

12 to fix8
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.3 s · 1.7 MB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.9 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 435 KiB

    About 435 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    3.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 709 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 8

    8/100

    Your mobile performance score is 8 (desktop: 27). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Cookiebot and others), adding 924 KiB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.2 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    487 KiB

    24 images could be 487 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,086 HTML elements

    The page has 2,086 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 240 ms

    240 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 240 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.53

    0.53

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.53 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    Your largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Duplo vise neta”. Most of its time is element render delay (5.7 s).

  • Speed Index: 20.4 s

    20.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 20.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.541

    0.541

    The layout shifts by 0.541 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 47 images without width and height

    47 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 242 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 147 ms

    147 ms

    Real visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 656 ms

    656 ms

    Real visitors wait 656 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 91 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 1.4 MB (54), scripts 1.1 MB (11) and fonts 105 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 17 images in older formats

    17 images (983 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 14 images below the first screen load straight away

    14 images further down the page (645 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 92.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

14 to fixGoogle 7381
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (17 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 17 tap targets too small

    17 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 22 images without alt text

    22 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8370
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “Privatni korisnici”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.yettel.rs/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 70 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 70 pages on yettel.rs and 13 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Yettel je prva mobilna mreža u Srbiji. Od početka komercijalnog poslovanja, 1994. godine, poverenje nam je ukazalo više…”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (535 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /sr/privatni all use the title “Privatni korisnici”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    /sr/privatni/podrska, /sr/privatni, /en/consumer, /webshop/sr/Privatni-korisnici/Mobilni-telefoni, /sr/privatni/paketi-i-dodaci/mobilna and /sr/privatni/net and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /sr/privatni, /en/consumer, /sr/privatni/ponuda/aktuelno/sjajna-tv-ponuda, /webshop/sr/Privatni-korisnici/Mobilni-telefoni, /sr/privatni/paketi-i-dodaci/mobilna and /sr/privatni/ponuda/aktuelno/kupi-uredjaj-u-yettelu have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /sr/privatni/ponuda/aktuelno/duplo-vise-neta and /sr/privatni/ponuda/tarifni-paketi/pripejd/registracija took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6981
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “lang is not defined”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 4 low-resolution images

    4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    41 of 51 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 18 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 655 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 655 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yettel.rs, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1994
Headquarters
Belgrade

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 55 issues on yettel.rs, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25