Website review, no card needed
ynov.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202631 issues · 83 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on ynov.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 349 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 328 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 271 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 82
82/100Your mobile performance score is 82. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, piwik.pro and Cloudflare and others), adding 667 KiB and 865 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 736 ms
736 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 736 ms of main-thread work and 522 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 375 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 300 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
271 KiBAbout 271 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,204 HTML elements
The page has 2,204 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
71 KiB3 images could be 71 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
48 KiBAbout 48 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
30 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (30 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
17 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 198 ms
198 msYour server sent the HTML in 198 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 10.0 s
10.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 701 ms
701 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 701 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 227 ms
227 msReal visitors wait 227 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 776 ms
776 msReal visitors wait 776 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 349 ms to 271 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 2.5 s
2.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sYour largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “L'école des transformations digitales”.
Images and page weight
1 image far larger than shown
8 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example key-figures-feature-illustration-1.webp at 747 px wide, shown at 235 px. Resized copies would save about 8 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (142 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 65.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 53 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 53 requests on a phone: scripts 740 KiB (22), images 584 KiB (16) and fonts 527 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (4 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (FAQPage and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https://www.ynov.com/build/svg/logo-ynov-campus.svg")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
355 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 355 pages on ynov.com and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “Ynov est La référence française des formations aux métiers du digital. Avec des formations dans les domaines des nouvel…”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “École supérieure de formation aux métiers du digital - Ynov”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ynov.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ynov.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ynov.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,445 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.ynov.com/guide-parents-scolarite-enfant, https://www.ynov.com/evenements, https://www.ynov.com/formations/cybersecurite, https://www.ynov.com/formations/cybersecurite/bachelor-cybersecurite, https://www.ynov.com/formations/cybersecurite/mastere-expert-en-cybersecurite and https://www.ynov.com/formations/cybersecurite/mastere-expert-en-cybersecurite-pentester and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 189 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
36 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 974 words of copy
The homepage carries about 974 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ynov.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Founded
- 2011
- Headquarters
- Mérignac
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on ynov.com, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.