Website review, no card needed
zetland.dk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202640 issues · 84 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on zetland.dk, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 82). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.4 MB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.4 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.3 MB12 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 393 KiBAbout 393 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (sanity.io, mux.com and imgix and others), adding 6.1 MB and 1 ms of main-thread time.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 503 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 0 ms
0 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 4.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,819 HTML elements
The page has 1,819 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
imgix adds 0 ms
0 msimgix costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 20 KiBAbout 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 82 but mobile only 49. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 210 ms
210 msYour server sent the HTML in 210 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sYour largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Video thumbnail”.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 563 ms
563 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 563 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 121 ms
121 msReal visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 367 ms
367 msReal visitors wait 367 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors
-26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.3 MB in 94 requests
7.3 MBYour homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 94 requests on a phone: media 4.5 MB (5), images 1.6 MB (17) and scripts 1,024 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
2025101410240658256x5504ma.jpg weighs 920 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
920 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2025101410240658256x5504ma.jpg at 8,192 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 920 KiB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
thumbnail.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image in older formats
1 image (159 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.06 g of CO₂e: 247.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (38 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 38 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 112 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (7 characters)
Your title is only 7 characters: “Zetland”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (227 characters)
Your meta description is 227 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
11 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 11 pages on zetland.dk and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.zetland.dk/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zetland.dk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler
1 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.zetland.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,314 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages share a title
/, https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem, https://www.zetland.dk/virksomhed, https://www.zetland.dk/undervisning and https://www.zetland.dk/voreshelte all use the title “Zetland”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages share a meta description
https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem, https://www.zetland.dk/forlag, https://www.zetland.dk/virksomhed, https://www.zetland.dk/undervisning, https://www.zetland.dk/voreshelte and https://www.zetland.dk/vilkaar use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.zetland.dk/forlag, whose canonical is https://www.zetland.dk/publishing. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page with very little text
https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,301 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,301 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zetland.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Vercel
Company
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- Bygmestervej
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on zetland.dk, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.