Website review, no card needed

zetland.dk logo

zetland.dk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202640 issues · 84 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on zetland.dk, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
169 ms124 msMay 2Oct 17153 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026133 ms
May 9, 2026130 ms
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026139 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026152 ms
Jul 11, 2026158 ms
Jul 18, 2026158 ms
Jul 25, 2026156 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 8, 2026163 ms
Aug 15, 2026163 ms
Aug 22, 2026164 ms
Aug 29, 2026162 ms
Sep 5, 2026160 ms
Sep 12, 2026156 ms
Sep 19, 2026154 ms
Sep 26, 2026154 ms
Oct 3, 2026153 ms
Oct 10, 2026152 ms
Oct 17, 2026153 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zetland.dk (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zetland.dk at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. zetland.dk at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. zetland.dk at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. zetland.dk at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. zetland.dk at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. zetland.dk at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. zetland.dk at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. zetland.dk at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

11 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 82). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.4 MB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.4 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 MB

    12 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 393 KiB

    About 393 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (sanity.io, mux.com and imgix and others), adding 6.1 MB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 503 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 4.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,819 HTML elements

    The page has 1,819 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • imgix adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    imgix costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    About 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 82 but mobile only 49. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 210 ms

    210 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 210 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 16.1 s

    16.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Your largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Video thumbnail”.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 563 ms

    563 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 563 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 367 ms

    367 ms

    Real visitors wait 367 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix29
  • Page weight: 7.3 MB in 94 requests

    7.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 94 requests on a phone: media 4.5 MB (5), images 1.6 MB (17) and scripts 1,024 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    2025101410240658256x5504ma.jpg weighs 920 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    920 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2025101410240658256x5504ma.jpg at 8,192 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 920 KiB.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    thumbnail.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (159 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.06 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.06 g of CO₂e: 247.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9193
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (38 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 38 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 112 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10074
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “Zetland”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (227 characters)

    Your meta description is 227 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 11 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 11 pages on zetland.dk and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.zetland.dk/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zetland.dk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler

    1 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.zetland.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,314 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 5 pages share a title

    /, https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem, https://www.zetland.dk/virksomhed, https://www.zetland.dk/undervisning and https://www.zetland.dk/voreshelte all use the title “Zetland”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem, https://www.zetland.dk/forlag, https://www.zetland.dk/virksomhed, https://www.zetland.dk/undervisning, https://www.zetland.dk/voreshelte and https://www.zetland.dk/vilkaar use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.zetland.dk/forlag, whose canonical is https://www.zetland.dk/publishing. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.zetland.dk/nytmedlem took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,301 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,301 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zetland.dk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Bygmestervej

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on zetland.dk, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25