Website review, no card needed

zyla.in logo

zyla.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202639 issues · 69 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on zyla.in, 13 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.8 sApr 25Oct 102.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
190 ms120 msApr 25Oct 10169 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026140 ms
May 2, 2026144 ms
May 9, 2026149 ms
May 16, 2026139 ms
May 23, 2026132 ms
May 30, 2026140 ms
Jun 6, 2026128 ms
Jun 13, 2026140 ms
Jun 20, 2026146 ms
Jun 27, 2026141 ms
Jul 4, 2026148 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026142 ms
Jul 25, 2026151 ms
Aug 1, 2026156 ms
Aug 8, 2026165 ms
Aug 15, 2026178 ms
Aug 22, 2026178 ms
Aug 29, 2026182 ms
Sep 5, 2026181 ms
Sep 12, 2026181 ms
Sep 19, 2026175 ms
Sep 26, 2026167 ms
Oct 3, 2026175 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zyla.in (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zyla.in at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. zyla.in at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. zyla.in at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. zyla.in at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. zyla.in at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. zyla.in at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. zyla.in at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. zyla.in at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

7 to fix63
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 385 KiB

    About 385 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 320 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (320 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 816 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63 (desktop: 81). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hotjar and others), adding 970 KiB and 745 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 439 ms

    439 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 439 ms of main-thread work and 647 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 168 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    146 KiB

    3 images could be 146 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Your largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Building a healthier tomorrow”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 226 ms

    226 ms

    Real visitors wait 226 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 914 ms

    914 ms

    Real visitors wait 914 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 318 ms

    318 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 318 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.065

    0.065

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.065, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 69 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 69 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (24), media 734 KiB (2) and images 271 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.64 g of CO₂e: 76.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9486
  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 checks passed
  • 17 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 21 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 17 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 10055
  • No page title

    Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.

  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

3 checks passed
  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: LocalBusiness.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://zyla.in/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://zyla.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9292
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix44
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 1 words

    The homepage has only about 1 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zyla.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
Google Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on zyla.in, including 17 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25