Adentris growth playbook

Add a fourth card, "Growing Networks, 4 to 9 locations", between Clinics and Multi-Site. Say what it includes (two modules, per-location and per-clinician views, a named customer success manager), the usual starting point (documentation compliance plus denials) and the case study that fits. On every card, make the first step the revenue check: "Send 60-90 days of denials. Get a written report. Zero obligation." Carry the chosen location band from the pricing page into the form, so sales knows the segment before the first call.

Buyers who can't find their size assume the product isn't for them, or that they'll be quoted as an enterprise. A free first step on their own data lowers the risk of a twelve-month agreement, and a $1.4M median is a stronger hook than "Contact sales".

[ ] Card title: Growing Networks, 4 to 9 locations
[ ] Included: two modules, per-location views, named CSM
[ ] Usual start: documentation compliance + denials
[ ] Proof: the case study closest in size
[ ] Button: Start with a free revenue check (/revenue-check)
[ ] Same button on the other three cards
[ ] Location band passed into the form
[ ] Monthly report: checks and demos by band

• A new tier implies a price commitment

  Keep it quoted, as on the other cards; the card describes fit and scope, not a number.

• More free checks than the team can deliver

  Cap checks per month and keep a waitlist.

• Your websitePricing page: three plans, "Clinics & Single Practices" for "1 to 3 locations", "Multi-Site & Regional Systems" for "10 to 50 locations" and "Enterprise Healthcare Systems" for "50+ locations, IDNs, and hospital groups"; no prices ("Priced to the organization"); annual agreements with monthly payment; no free trial, a "rapid audit pilot" instead; Enterprise includes "Managed billing services"; no outcome guarantee; no link to the revenue check.Source
• Your websiteContact sales page: the Locations dropdown offers "1 to 3", "4 to 9", "10 to 50" and "50 or more"; "Sales replies within one business day"; the rapid audit pilot "returns first findings in about three days, before you commit".Source
• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source
• Your websiteRevenue check page (/revenue-check): send 60-90 days of EOBs, denials or prior auth submissions for a written report in 30 days with "Zero obligation"; "$1.4M median recoverable revenue surfaced per check, multi-site mid-market"; a calculator (60,000 claims at $180 with a 12% denial rate shows $673,920 to $941,414 a year). It is not linked from the header or footer menus.Source
• Your websiteFAQ: "Live in 30 days on any EHR via the AI Web Agent layer"; "Most customers are live in 30 days"; the strongest fit is "behavioral health platforms with in-house billing, multi-location specialty groups, and ambulatory surgery centers"; the trial is a "paid-scope rapid audit" with first findings "in about three days"; public references are Sobrius Health and Resilient Recovery Treatment, others under NDA.Source

Use one honest statement everywhere, for example: "First findings in 3 days. Most single-module customers live in 30 days. A 20-person multi-site rollout took 60 days." Update the homepage stats, the FAQ, the pricing FAQ, the integrations FAQ and the search snippet together.

Regulated buyers read inconsistency as risk. One staged promise (findings, then first module, then full rollout) is more believable than any single number, and it matches the proof Adentris already has.

• A longer number looks worse than rivals

  Lead with three days to first findings, which is the fastest honest number.

• Your websiteHomepage: H1 "The AI platform for revenue integrity and compliance."; stats "73 → 96% documentation accuracy", "−62% claim denials", "60 days contract to full production", "Results in 3 days" and "From decision to going live: 30 days"; modules are called "Coding QA", "Prior Authorization" and "Appeals & Denials" on the page but "Autonomous Coding", "Prior Auth Autopilot" and "Denial Fightback" in the menu; every "Request a demo" button opens a Calendly booking page.Source
• Your websiteFAQ: "Live in 30 days on any EHR via the AI Web Agent layer"; "Most customers are live in 30 days"; the strongest fit is "behavioral health platforms with in-house billing, multi-location specialty groups, and ambulatory surgery centers"; the trial is a "paid-scope rapid audit" with first findings "in about three days"; public references are Sobrius Health and Resilient Recovery Treatment, others under NDA.Source
• Your websitePricing page: three plans, "Clinics & Single Practices" for "1 to 3 locations", "Multi-Site & Regional Systems" for "10 to 50 locations" and "Enterprise Healthcare Systems" for "50+ locations, IDNs, and hospital groups"; no prices ("Priced to the organization"); annual agreements with monthly payment; no free trial, a "rapid audit pilot" instead; Enterprise includes "Managed billing services"; no outcome guarantee; no link to the revenue check.Source

Add "Free revenue check" to the header next to Contact Sales and to the footer. After every template download, show a thank-you screen: "Want these numbers on your real claims? Send 60-90 days of denials." Put the same panel at the end of each relevant blog post.

Someone who just downloaded a denial calculator has said they have a denial problem. The next step should be the offer that turns their estimate into a verified number.

• Low-fit requests from tiny practices

  Ask monthly claim volume on the form and route small ones to a self-serve estimate.

• Your websiteRevenue check page (/revenue-check): send 60-90 days of EOBs, denials or prior auth submissions for a written report in 30 days with "Zero obligation"; "$1.4M median recoverable revenue surfaced per check, multi-site mid-market"; a calculator (60,000 claims at $180 with a 12% denial rate shows $673,920 to $941,414 a year). It is not linked from the header or footer menus.Source
• Your websiteTemplates: 10 free templates, including a 42 CFR Part 2 consent checklist, an ASAM documentation checklist and an SUD chart audit scorecard; the denial loss calculator is an Excel download behind a work-email form and links to the denial and AR audit pages, not to the revenue check.Source
• Your websiteSitemap (41 URLs, checked November 9, 2026): 7 solution pages, 4 service pages, 10 templates, 3 case studies and /revenue-check; no comparison pages, no per-EHR pages, no pages by care setting, and no blog posts, because the blog lives on blog.adentris.com.Source

Remove the dated promise, or replace it with "More references available under NDA" and a request button. Add a fact box to each story: care setting, locations, EHR, modules, time to first findings, result. Tag each story by EHR so the integrations cards can link to it.

A missed date on the proof page is a small credibility loss at the moment of evaluation. Location and EHR let buyers match themselves to a story in seconds.

• Customers won't share location counts

  Use ranges such as "5-9 sites".

• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source
• Your websiteIntegrations page: eight EHRs (Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Kipu Health, Alleva, Ritten, Ease Health, PIMSY), each "Live · ready to connect"; case studies appear only under Kipu and Alleva; every "Connect [EHR] →" button points to a contact anchor on the same page, and there are no per-EHR pages.Source

Name the path on every page: Step 1, free revenue check (claims and denials data, written report). Step 2, rapid audit pilot on live charts (state whether it is paid and what it costs, or that it is credited against the first year). Step 3, annual agreement. Keep the AR audit and payer audit readiness as separate paid services for buyers who don't want software.

Clear, staged commitments shorten evaluation for risk-averse buyers, and a stated pilot cost (even "credited in full") stops the "is this free?" back-and-forth on calls.

• Paid pilots slow deals

  Credit the pilot fee against the first year.

• #3 Link the free revenue check from the menu, the pricing page and every template

• Your websiteFAQ: "Live in 30 days on any EHR via the AI Web Agent layer"; "Most customers are live in 30 days"; the strongest fit is "behavioral health platforms with in-house billing, multi-location specialty groups, and ambulatory surgery centers"; the trial is a "paid-scope rapid audit" with first findings "in about three days"; public references are Sobrius Health and Resilient Recovery Treatment, others under NDA.Source
• Your websiteContact sales page: the Locations dropdown offers "1 to 3", "4 to 9", "10 to 50" and "50 or more"; "Sales replies within one business day"; the rapid audit pilot "returns first findings in about three days, before you commit".Source
• Your websiteRevenue check page (/revenue-check): send 60-90 days of EOBs, denials or prior auth submissions for a written report in 30 days with "Zero obligation"; "$1.4M median recoverable revenue surfaced per check, multi-site mid-market"; a calculator (60,000 claims at $180 with a 12% denial rate shows $673,920 to $941,414 a year). It is not linked from the header or footer menus.Source
• Your websiteServices page: AR Audit and RCM Insights ("Know where your AR is leaking. In under three days."), 42 CFR Part 2 Compliance Monitoring (baseline findings within a week) and Payer Audit Readiness (a mock UPIC, RAC, TPE or commercial audit on 30-60 charts with extrapolation exposure in dollars); "Billing operations, payer escalation desk, and compliance support" are listed as coming in 2026.Source

Pick one name per module. Keep the plain name as the main label and the brand name as a subtitle if wanted ("Coding QA · Autonomous Coding"). Update the homepage, menu, solution page titles, pricing, revenue check checkboxes and the sales deck together.

Procurement and compliance teams copy product names into scorecards, and consistent names make the platform look like one system.

• Losing branded names

  Keep them as subtitles.

• Your websiteHomepage: H1 "The AI platform for revenue integrity and compliance."; stats "73 → 96% documentation accuracy", "−62% claim denials", "60 days contract to full production", "Results in 3 days" and "From decision to going live: 30 days"; modules are called "Coding QA", "Prior Authorization" and "Appeals & Denials" on the page but "Autonomous Coding", "Prior Auth Autopilot" and "Denial Fightback" in the menu; every "Request a demo" button opens a Calendly booking page.Source
• Your websiteSitemap (41 URLs, checked November 9, 2026): 7 solution pages, 4 service pages, 10 templates, 3 case studies and /revenue-check; no comparison pages, no per-EHR pages, no pages by care setting, and no blog posts, because the blog lives on blog.adentris.com.Source

Raise contrast on the flagged text, fix the heading order on the homepage, and inline or defer the render-blocking CSS and fonts. Re-run PageSpeed and keep the accessibility score at 100 as part of each release.

It is a small fix that removes an easy objection in regulated procurement and keeps the site's strong speed.

• Design changes from new colours

  Adjust only the flagged tokens.

• PageSpeedGoogle PageSpeed (November 9, 2026): mobile performance 99, desktop 97, SEO 100, accessibility 95; real visitors pass Core Web Vitals in Chrome field data (LCP 764 ms, INP 50 ms, CLS 0.02 at the 75th percentile); remaining items are about 0.7 s of render-blocking requests, low colour contrast and out-of-order headings.Source

Create /integrations/kipu, /alleva, /ritten, /ease-health, /pimsy and later Epic, athenahealth and eClinicalWorks. Each page covers how Adentris reads that EHR (API, feed or AI Web Agent), what it checks (ASAM, Part 2, payer rules), the matching case study, a sample finding and a revenue check form that has the EHR prefilled.

EHR is the first filter BH/SUD buyers apply. Pages that name it rank for intent searches and answer the "will it work with our system?" objection before the call.

• Trademark concerns

  Use names descriptively, avoid logos without permission and add a non-affiliation note.

• #4 Replace the overdue "Q3 2026" references line with location counts and EHRs on each case study

• Your websiteIntegrations page: eight EHRs (Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Kipu Health, Alleva, Ritten, Ease Health, PIMSY), each "Live · ready to connect"; case studies appear only under Kipu and Alleva; every "Connect [EHR] →" button points to a contact anchor on the same page, and there are no per-EHR pages.Source
• Your websiteSitemap (41 URLs, checked November 9, 2026): 7 solution pages, 4 service pages, 10 templates, 3 case studies and /revenue-check; no comparison pages, no per-EHR pages, no pages by care setting, and no blog posts, because the blog lives on blog.adentris.com.Source
• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source

Write two factual pages for SUD and BH buyers: coverage of ASAM and 42 CFR Part 2 rules, live-in-care versus after-the-fact review, EHR routes, RCM and billing scope, deployment model, security attestations, and how to start (the revenue check). Cite each rival's own public pages, date each page and review it quarterly.

Buyers who search for comparisons are close to a decision. A fair page that names Adentris's SUD depth turns a crowded category into a specific choice.

• Inaccurate competitor claims

  Cite only rivals' own public pages and date each claim.

• Competitor researchRivals' own homepages: Eleos Health, a "system of action" for community-based care that reviews 100% of notes, works in any web-based EHR through a browser extension, serves 300+ organizations including SUD treatment, and sells documentation, compliance and RCM products; Brellium ("Audit every chart. Capture every earned dollar.") audits 100% of documentation and coding for behavioral health, ABA and other specialties.See the research Source
• BlogBlog "The Chart" on blog.adentris.com: frequent posts for BH and SUD teams, e.g. "Prepayment Review in Behavioral Health" (November 9, 2026), "Days in AR for Behavioral Health: Benchmarks, AR Aging, and What Lenders Look At" (November 5), "Behavioral Health Billing Companies (2026): 10 Firms Compared" (October 28), "Best Prior Authorization Software (2026): 10 Options Compared" (October 22), "42 CFR Part 2 in 2026" (October 21) and "UPIC Audit Response for Behavioral Health and SUD Providers: The First 30 Days" (October 14); 18 pages of posts.Source
• Your websiteDocumentation Compliance page: reviews 100% of active charts versus 5-10% for sample audits; the rule library includes ASAM, Joint Commission, CMS-0057-F, MHPAEA parity, 42 CFR Part 2 and Virginia behavioral health rules; the worked example is a 200-bed hospital system (about 12,000 charts a month, about $840K a year); it compares itself with unnamed "other CDI tools".Source

Build /behavioral-health-sud as the main landing page for that market: ASAM level logic, 42 CFR Part 2, utilization review and payer audits, a worked example for a 6-site residential and outpatient network, the three SUD case studies, Kipu and Alleva, the templates and the revenue check. Point ads, partner links and the SUD blog posts to it. Keep hospital pages, but stop making them the default story.

Buyers convert when they see their own setting, numbers and rules. A dedicated page also gives the reseller and the new services lead one link to share.

• Hospital prospects feel ignored

  Keep a hospital page with its own example.

• Your websiteDocumentation Compliance page: reviews 100% of active charts versus 5-10% for sample audits; the rule library includes ASAM, Joint Commission, CMS-0057-F, MHPAEA parity, 42 CFR Part 2 and Virginia behavioral health rules; the worked example is a 200-bed hospital system (about 12,000 charts a month, about $840K a year); it compares itself with unnamed "other CDI tools".Source
• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source
• HiringDirector of Product, RCM Services, Healthcare (the only open role; $150K-$200K and 0.50%-2.00% equity; Austin, Denver, Phoenix, Reno or Los Angeles): build a technology-enabled RCM services business "from a blank page" for BH/SUD providers without their own billing teams; own the operating model, SOPs, quality controls and credentialing (Medicaid and Medicare); hire the billing, implementation and account management team; support executive sales; source acquisition targets in the SUD billing market; measured on clean-claim rate, denial rate and days in A/R.Source

Publish a short "Billing operations for SUD programs: design partners" page with a waitlist form (EHR, payers, monthly claims, current billing setup). Choose five programs across two EHRs, run their billing with the platform's checks in front, and measure clean-claim rate, denial rate and days in A/R against their baseline. Use the results to set pricing and the SOPs the new hire is asked to write.

Design partners turn a blank-page mandate into real SOPs and pricing quickly, and they bring revenue and case studies with them. Programs without billing teams have the least access to tools that fix denials at source.

• Services margins dilute the software business

  Track gross margin per account from day one and cap the partner count.

• Credentialing delays

  Start with programs already credentialed with their payers.

• HiringDirector of Product, RCM Services, Healthcare (the only open role; $150K-$200K and 0.50%-2.00% equity; Austin, Denver, Phoenix, Reno or Los Angeles): build a technology-enabled RCM services business "from a blank page" for BH/SUD providers without their own billing teams; own the operating model, SOPs, quality controls and credentialing (Medicaid and Medicare); hire the billing, implementation and account management team; support executive sales; source acquisition targets in the SUD billing market; measured on clean-claim rate, denial rate and days in A/R.Source
• Your websiteServices page: AR Audit and RCM Insights ("Know where your AR is leaking. In under three days."), 42 CFR Part 2 Compliance Monitoring (baseline findings within a week) and Payer Audit Readiness (a mock UPIC, RAC, TPE or commercial audit on 30-60 charts with extrapolation exposure in dollars); "Billing operations, payer escalation desk, and compliance support" are listed as coming in 2026.Source
• Your websitePricing page: three plans, "Clinics & Single Practices" for "1 to 3 locations", "Multi-Site & Regional Systems" for "10 to 50 locations" and "Enterprise Healthcare Systems" for "50+ locations, IDNs, and hospital groups"; no prices ("Priced to the organization"); annual agreements with monthly payment; no free trial, a "rapid audit pilot" instead; Enterprise includes "Managed billing services"; no outcome guarantee; no link to the revenue check.Source
• Company profileY Combinator profile: Spring 2025 batch, founded 2025, team size 5, formerly WorkDone Health (rebranded as Adentris in September 2025); also offers billing as a service for providers without in-house CDI or billing teams.Source

Package a "portfolio revenue check": the same free check run across every site an owner controls, with one roll-up report (recoverable dollars by site, top denial causes, documentation risk) and a portfolio rollout price. Give the partner a one-page brief, a sample anonymized report and a shared pipeline sheet.

Investors think in portfolios and comparable numbers. One report across all sites shows the size of the prize, and the weakest sites, in a form they can act on.

• Portfolio data access across different EHRs

  Start with claims and denial exports, which every site can send.

• #3 Link the free revenue check from the menu, the pricing page and every template

• PressPartnership (August 19, 2026): Grant Global & Associates, which advises institutional healthcare operators and their investors on compliance and governance, became a reseller and implementation partner for Adentris, aimed at private-equity-backed behavioral health operators and their investors.Source
• Your websiteRevenue check page (/revenue-check): send 60-90 days of EOBs, denials or prior auth submissions for a written report in 30 days with "Zero obligation"; "$1.4M median recoverable revenue surfaced per check, multi-site mid-market"; a calculator (60,000 claims at $180 with a 12% denial rate shows $673,920 to $941,414 a year). It is not linked from the header or footer menus.Source

Serve the blog at adentris.com/blog (through a reverse proxy or by moving it into the main site build), with 301 redirects from every old URL, one sitemap, consistent navigation and the revenue check panel. Link each post to its matching solution page and template.

Content and product pages on one host share authority and internal links, which helps solution pages rank for the same topics the posts already cover.

• A temporary ranking dip

  Redirect one-to-one and keep titles unchanged.

• Your websiteSitemap (41 URLs, checked November 9, 2026): 7 solution pages, 4 service pages, 10 templates, 3 case studies and /revenue-check; no comparison pages, no per-EHR pages, no pages by care setting, and no blog posts, because the blog lives on blog.adentris.com.Source
• BlogBlog "The Chart" on blog.adentris.com: frequent posts for BH and SUD teams, e.g. "Prepayment Review in Behavioral Health" (November 9, 2026), "Days in AR for Behavioral Health: Benchmarks, AR Aging, and What Lenders Look At" (November 5), "Behavioral Health Billing Companies (2026): 10 Firms Compared" (October 28), "Best Prior Authorization Software (2026): 10 Options Compared" (October 22), "42 CFR Part 2 in 2026" (October 21) and "UPIC Audit Response for Behavioral Health and SUD Providers: The First 30 Days" (October 14); 18 pages of posts.Source

Tag every post by problem (payer audit, AR, Part 2, denials, prior auth, documentation) and add a closing panel that names the matching service or template, the turnaround ("findings in under three days", "baseline in one week") and a booking link. Add an "In an active audit?" fast-track line to the UPIC and prepayment review posts.

Readers arrive with a specific, urgent problem. Offering the matching service, rather than a generic demo, cuts the step between reading and buying.

• Posts feel salesy

  One panel at the end, after the full answer.

• BlogBlog "The Chart" on blog.adentris.com: frequent posts for BH and SUD teams, e.g. "Prepayment Review in Behavioral Health" (November 9, 2026), "Days in AR for Behavioral Health: Benchmarks, AR Aging, and What Lenders Look At" (November 5), "Behavioral Health Billing Companies (2026): 10 Firms Compared" (October 28), "Best Prior Authorization Software (2026): 10 Options Compared" (October 22), "42 CFR Part 2 in 2026" (October 21) and "UPIC Audit Response for Behavioral Health and SUD Providers: The First 30 Days" (October 14); 18 pages of posts.Source
• Your websiteServices page: AR Audit and RCM Insights ("Know where your AR is leaking. In under three days."), 42 CFR Part 2 Compliance Monitoring (baseline findings within a week) and Payer Audit Readiness (a mock UPIC, RAC, TPE or commercial audit on 30-60 charts with extrapolation exposure in dollars); "Billing operations, payer escalation desk, and compliance support" are listed as coming in 2026.Source
• Your websiteTemplates: 10 free templates, including a 42 CFR Part 2 consent checklist, an ASAM documentation checklist and an SUD chart audit scorecard; the denial loss calculator is an Excel download behind a work-email form and links to the denial and AR audit pages, not to the revenue check.Source

Generate a one-page PDF and email for each customer's executive sponsor: findings caught before billing, estimated dollars protected, denial rate trend, documentation accuracy by site, top three fixes (such as the template change that drove a third of findings at Solutions 2 Recovery) and what to do next month. Review it on a quarterly call and use it as the basis of the renewal.

Visible, repeated value lowers churn on annual contracts and creates natural moments to add modules and sites.

• Dollar estimates challenged

  Show the method and a conservative range.

• Your websiteHomepage: H1 "The AI platform for revenue integrity and compliance."; stats "73 → 96% documentation accuracy", "−62% claim denials", "60 days contract to full production", "Results in 3 days" and "From decision to going live: 30 days"; modules are called "Coding QA", "Prior Authorization" and "Appeals & Denials" on the page but "Autonomous Coding", "Prior Auth Autopilot" and "Denial Fightback" in the menu; every "Request a demo" button opens a Calendly booking page.Source
• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source
• Your websitePricing page: three plans, "Clinics & Single Practices" for "1 to 3 locations", "Multi-Site & Regional Systems" for "10 to 50 locations" and "Enterprise Healthcare Systems" for "50+ locations, IDNs, and hospital groups"; no prices ("Priced to the organization"); annual agreements with monthly payment; no free trial, a "rapid audit pilot" instead; Enterprise includes "Managed billing services"; no outcome guarantee; no link to the revenue check.Source

Build a 15-question online Part 2 readiness check (consent forms, EHR segmentation, disclosure logs, staff training, vendor agreements) that returns a score and the three biggest gaps, with the rule references, on screen. Offer the full baseline assessment as the next step, and email the results only if the visitor asks.

Interactive scores get completed and shared more than PDFs, and the answers tell sales exactly which gaps to discuss.

• Seen as legal advice

  Label it as a readiness check, not legal advice, and cite the rule text.

• #9 Give behavioral health and SUD programs their own front door, with proof in their language

• Your websiteServices page: AR Audit and RCM Insights ("Know where your AR is leaking. In under three days."), 42 CFR Part 2 Compliance Monitoring (baseline findings within a week) and Payer Audit Readiness (a mock UPIC, RAC, TPE or commercial audit on 30-60 charts with extrapolation exposure in dollars); "Billing operations, payer escalation desk, and compliance support" are listed as coming in 2026.Source
• Your websiteTemplates: 10 free templates, including a 42 CFR Part 2 consent checklist, an ASAM documentation checklist and an SUD chart audit scorecard; the denial loss calculator is an Excel download behind a work-email form and links to the denial and AR audit pages, not to the revenue check.Source
• BlogBlog "The Chart" on blog.adentris.com: frequent posts for BH and SUD teams, e.g. "Prepayment Review in Behavioral Health" (November 9, 2026), "Days in AR for Behavioral Health: Benchmarks, AR Aging, and What Lenders Look At" (November 5), "Behavioral Health Billing Companies (2026): 10 Firms Compared" (October 28), "Best Prior Authorization Software (2026): 10 Options Compared" (October 22), "42 CFR Part 2 in 2026" (October 21) and "UPIC Audit Response for Behavioral Health and SUD Providers: The First 30 Days" (October 14); 18 pages of posts.Source

Offer each referenceable customer a clear deal: no more than two reference calls a month, a year-end credit or extra module time for each referred program that signs, and early access to new modules. On the case-study and pricing pages, add "Talk to an SUD operator who uses Adentris" for prospects who have finished a revenue check.

Peer calls answer the trust questions a vendor cannot, and limiting them to qualified prospects protects the customers' time.

• Reference fatigue

  Cap calls per customer per month.

• #4 Replace the overdue "Q3 2026" references line with location counts and EHRs on each case study

• Your websiteFAQ: "Live in 30 days on any EHR via the AI Web Agent layer"; "Most customers are live in 30 days"; the strongest fit is "behavioral health platforms with in-house billing, multi-location specialty groups, and ambulatory surgery centers"; the trial is a "paid-scope rapid audit" with first findings "in about three days"; public references are Sobrius Health and Resilient Recovery Treatment, others under NDA.Source
• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source

Define the target profile (SUD-focused, 10-40 clients, on EHRs Adentris supports, clean compliance history), screen a shortlist, and model the uplift from running Adentris checks before every claim. After closing, run the revenue check on every acquired client, fix the top denial causes, then offer software plus services. Publish before-and-after clean-claim and denial rates.

It buys distribution and operating know-how at the same time, and every acquired client is an immediate proof point for the platform.

• Inheriting compliance problems

  Run a payer audit readiness review on the target's client charts during diligence.

• Distraction for a small team

  Only after the design-partner model works.

• #10 Sign five design-partner programs for the RCM services line before it is announced

• HiringDirector of Product, RCM Services, Healthcare (the only open role; $150K-$200K and 0.50%-2.00% equity; Austin, Denver, Phoenix, Reno or Los Angeles): build a technology-enabled RCM services business "from a blank page" for BH/SUD providers without their own billing teams; own the operating model, SOPs, quality controls and credentialing (Medicaid and Medicare); hire the billing, implementation and account management team; support executive sales; source acquisition targets in the SUD billing market; measured on clean-claim rate, denial rate and days in A/R.Source
• Company profileY Combinator profile: Spring 2025 batch, founded 2025, team size 5, formerly WorkDone Health (rebranded as Adentris in September 2025); also offers billing as a service for providers without in-house CDI or billing teams.Source
• Your websiteServices page: AR Audit and RCM Insights ("Know where your AR is leaking. In under three days."), 42 CFR Part 2 Compliance Monitoring (baseline findings within a week) and Payer Audit Readiness (a mock UPIC, RAC, TPE or commercial audit on 30-60 charts with extrapolation exposure in dollars); "Billing operations, payer escalation desk, and compliance support" are listed as coming in 2026.Source

Publish "The State of SUD Documentation" once a year: the most common gaps by ASAM level, how often they relate to denials, accuracy before and after continuous review, and how long fixes take. Use only anonymized, aggregated data with customer permission. Release it with a webinar, a press note and a free "compare your program" scorecard.

Original data earns press, links and citations, and it positions Adentris as the reference for SUD documentation quality, which reinforces the blog and the revenue check.

• Re-identification of small programs

  Minimum cohort sizes and no site-level data.

• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source
• Your websiteDocumentation Compliance page: reviews 100% of active charts versus 5-10% for sample audits; the rule library includes ASAM, Joint Commission, CMS-0057-F, MHPAEA parity, 42 CFR Part 2 and Virginia behavioral health rules; the worked example is a 200-bed hospital system (about 12,000 charts a month, about $840K a year); it compares itself with unnamed "other CDI tools".Source
• BlogBlog "The Chart" on blog.adentris.com: frequent posts for BH and SUD teams, e.g. "Prepayment Review in Behavioral Health" (November 9, 2026), "Days in AR for Behavioral Health: Benchmarks, AR Aging, and What Lenders Look At" (November 5), "Behavioral Health Billing Companies (2026): 10 Firms Compared" (October 28), "Best Prior Authorization Software (2026): 10 Options Compared" (October 22), "42 CFR Part 2 in 2026" (October 21) and "UPIC Audit Response for Behavioral Health and SUD Providers: The First 30 Days" (October 14); 18 pages of posts.Source

Pilot an optional outcome-linked plan for multi-site BH/SUD networks: a lower base fee plus a share of measured savings (denials prevented and recovered against the revenue check baseline), capped, with a floor. Write the measurement method into the agreement and report it monthly. Keep the standard plan for buyers who prefer a fixed price.

It turns Adentris's best proof into a commercial promise and removes the main objection from CFOs, while the revenue check makes the baseline objective.

• Disputes over measurement

  An agreed baseline and formula signed before go-live.

• Arrangements that raise healthcare regulatory questions

  Have healthcare counsel review the fee structure before offering it.

• #5 Turn three competing first steps into one: the revenue check, then the pilot

• Your websitePricing page: three plans, "Clinics & Single Practices" for "1 to 3 locations", "Multi-Site & Regional Systems" for "10 to 50 locations" and "Enterprise Healthcare Systems" for "50+ locations, IDNs, and hospital groups"; no prices ("Priced to the organization"); annual agreements with monthly payment; no free trial, a "rapid audit pilot" instead; Enterprise includes "Managed billing services"; no outcome guarantee; no link to the revenue check.Source
• Your websiteCase studies page: three, all substance use disorder (SUD) providers: Sobrius Health (ASAM 2.5 and 3.5, Virginia; 60 days to full production; 100+ patients under continuous review), Solutions 2 Recovery (Los Angeles; +22% conformance in three weeks; 3,433 checks across 18 patients; "two fields missing from a note template caused a third of all findings") and Resilient Recovery Treatment (Los Angeles; documentation accuracy 73% to 96%; denials down 62% in 90 days; 7.6x ROI in four months). None states a location count or EHR, and the page says more named hospital and specialty group references will be published in Q3 2026.Source
• Your websiteRevenue check page (/revenue-check): send 60-90 days of EOBs, denials or prior auth submissions for a written report in 30 days with "Zero obligation"; "$1.4M median recoverable revenue surfaced per check, multi-site mid-market"; a calculator (60,000 claims at $180 with a 12% denial rate shows $673,920 to $941,414 a year). It is not linked from the header or footer menus.Source

Package a "diligence audit": a fixed-fee, two-week mock payer audit and AR snapshot on a target program, with a short report on documentation risk, denial patterns and extrapolation exposure. Offer it through the reseller and directly to healthcare investors and lenders. After the deal closes, the new owner is a warm lead for the full platform.

Investors pay for risk numbers before a deal, and every diligence audit puts Adentris inside a program that is about to change ownership and tighten its operations.

• Target programs refuse data access

  Run it as a condition of the deal, arranged by the buyer.

• #11 Give the private-equity reseller a portfolio-wide revenue check to sell

• PressPartnership (August 19, 2026): Grant Global & Associates, which advises institutional healthcare operators and their investors on compliance and governance, became a reseller and implementation partner for Adentris, aimed at private-equity-backed behavioral health operators and their investors.Source
• Your websiteServices page: AR Audit and RCM Insights ("Know where your AR is leaking. In under three days."), 42 CFR Part 2 Compliance Monitoring (baseline findings within a week) and Payer Audit Readiness (a mock UPIC, RAC, TPE or commercial audit on 30-60 charts with extrapolation exposure in dollars); "Billing operations, payer escalation desk, and compliance support" are listed as coming in 2026.Source
• BlogBlog "The Chart" on blog.adentris.com: frequent posts for BH and SUD teams, e.g. "Prepayment Review in Behavioral Health" (November 9, 2026), "Days in AR for Behavioral Health: Benchmarks, AR Aging, and What Lenders Look At" (November 5), "Behavioral Health Billing Companies (2026): 10 Firms Compared" (October 28), "Best Prior Authorization Software (2026): 10 Options Compared" (October 22), "42 CFR Part 2 in 2026" (October 21) and "UPIC Audit Response for Behavioral Health and SUD Providers: The First 30 Days" (October 14); 18 pages of posts.Source

Build a public demo on a fully synthetic SUD chart (no real patient data): the visitor picks a level of care, clicks "Draft summary", and sees the summary plus the compliance findings it raised, with rule citations. End with "Run this on your charts" leading to the revenue check or pilot.

Seeing real output removes doubt faster than a deck, and it qualifies visitors before they reach sales.

• Visitors paste real patient data

  Fixed synthetic charts only, with no free-text input.

• Your websiteAbout page: founded 2025, headquartered in Reno with team in Reno, San Francisco and Austin; Y Combinator (Spring 2025) and a pre-seed round from Pioneer Fund, DVC and Fjor; says discharge summaries are drafted from the chart in 60 seconds and an AR audit diagnostic is delivered in under 3 days.Source
• Your websiteHomepage: H1 "The AI platform for revenue integrity and compliance."; stats "73 → 96% documentation accuracy", "−62% claim denials", "60 days contract to full production", "Results in 3 days" and "From decision to going live: 30 days"; modules are called "Coding QA", "Prior Authorization" and "Appeals & Denials" on the page but "Autonomous Coding", "Prior Auth Autopilot" and "Denial Fightback" in the menu; every "Request a demo" button opens a Calendly booking page.Source
• Your websiteFAQ: "Live in 30 days on any EHR via the AI Web Agent layer"; "Most customers are live in 30 days"; the strongest fit is "behavioral health platforms with in-house billing, multi-location specialty groups, and ambulatory surgery centers"; the trial is a "paid-scope rapid audit" with first findings "in about three days"; public references are Sobrius Health and Resilient Recovery Treatment, others under NDA.Source