Close's /compare hub is the page a buyer reads when choosing between CRMs. It still says Close is "not the best-suited" for teams needing "marketing features like landing pages or forms", yet Close launched native Forms in January, sells them with "Cut one more tool from your stack", and includes them in Essentials. The hub also never mentions Chloe or AI: its "Where Close excels" list and its comparison table cover team size, pricing, calling and email, while Attio, Apollo and HubSpot all lead with AI on their own homepages. The new marketing engineer now owns this page in Astro and Sanity.
First action
Remove "or forms" from the weakness list today.
How to measure it
Trial starts from comparison pages
- Now
- –
- Target
- +15%
- By
- 60 days
Steps
Fix the line
Delete forms from the weakness list.
Product Marketing 1 hour
Add AI rows
Chloe and included AI credits, against each rival.
Product Marketing 2 days
Check rivals' AI
What each rival includes and charges for AI, dated.
Product Marketing 2 days
Shared copy
One Sanity field for strengths and weaknesses used by all comparison pages.
Senior Frontend Engineer - Marketing 2 days
Update the 12 pages
Same facts on every page.
Product Marketing 1 week
Refresh llms.txt
Same comparison facts for AI agents.
Senior Frontend Engineer - Marketing 1 hour
Measure
Trial starts and paid conversion from comparison traffic.
Staff GTM Analyst 6 weeks
Why it works
Rewrite the weakness list (keep the honest ones: proposals, inventory, field routing), add Forms to the strengths, and add two table rows: "AI sales agent that calls and qualifies leads" and "AI credits included". Link each row to /chloe and /forms. Then check the 12 individual comparison pages for the same out-of-date lines and keep the copy in one Sanity field shared by all of them.
Comparison pages are read at the point of decision, and an outdated weakness becomes a reason to choose a rival. The hub is also what AI assistants summarize when asked "Close vs X", the exact check the homepage invites with its "Verify it" box.
Ready to use
ChecklistComparison page refresh
[ ] "or forms" removed from the weakness list [ ] Forms added to strengths, linked to /forms [ ] Table row: AI sales agent (Chloe) [ ] Table row: AI credits included by plan [ ] Same facts on all 12 comparison pages [ ] llms.txt comparison section matches [ ] Date shown on the table
Risks and how to handle them
Overclaiming AI
State what Chloe does and on which plans, with links.
Rival facts change
Date the table and review it quarterly.
Evidence
- Your websiteThe /compare hub ("Close vs Other CRMs", checked October 22, 2026) lists under "Where Close is weaker": "Not the best-suited for organizations needing built-in proposal generators, product/inventory management, or marketing features like landing pages or forms". Its "Where Close excels" list and its 10-column comparison table (team size, pricing, budget, customer success, calling, email automation, training, admin needed) do not mention AI or Chloe anywhere in the page body.Source
- Your websiteClose sells native forms: the changelog announced "Automate Lead capture with our new Forms" on January 16, 2026; /forms says "Build no-code forms that live on your site, route leads into Close instantly" and "Cut one more tool from your stack"; the pricing page lists "Built-in forms" in Essentials and the main menu shows "Native forms - Capture leads straight into Close".Source
- Your websitePricing: Solo $19 monthly or $9 annually per user, Essentials $49 or $35, Growth $109 or $99 ("Most popular"), Scale $149 or $139; 500, 1,000, 1,500 and 2,000 AI credits per user a month ("Refreshes monthly (no rollover)", "Additional credits available"); "SAVE UP TO 50%" on annual; 14-day free trial with no credit card and a 30-day money-back guarantee.Source
- Your websiteChloe page: "You just added 20 salespeople. Her name is Chloe."; "Easy setup, no extra seat, no commission"; live counters of about 2M calls placed, 266K live conversations, $308M in open pipeline and 685K leads enriched. A separate /ai-sales-agent-trial landing page sells the trial around Chloe.Source
- Competitor researchRivals' own homepages: Pipedrive, "the easy-to-use, #1 user-rated CRM tool" with a 14-day trial; HubSpot, "Free CRM Software for Small Businesses ... with built-in AI"; Attio, "The CRM for agentic revenue"; Apollo, "The AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams"; HighLevel, an all-in-one platform agencies "white-label and resell".Source
- HiringSenior Frontend Engineer - Marketing (posted September 24, 2026), the first in the role: "We've recently migrated from Webflow to our own codebase (Astro, Sanity, Vercel)"; "We're primarily a self-service SMB business and that means that Close.com isn't just a brand experience. It's a critical part of our acquisition funnel"; "You'll own performance, technical SEO, and how the site shows up to search engines and AI agents"; build tools that help the site catch "regressions or flagging performance problems and SEO issues".Source
- Your websiteHomepage: "The CRM that sells with you"; "11,500+ sales teams trust Close", "2B+ calls, texts, and emails sent", "4.7 rating across 2,000+ G2 reviews"; results such as Flatiron School "75% conversion increase" and Sisu "$100K saved on software"; a "Verify it" box: "See what ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity say about Close."Source