The PMM post says the sale is long and built on trust because teams must bring proprietary data. Welch's trusted Merciv after it reached the same conclusions on about ten of their past reports. That is the proof every new buyer needs, and it can be the first step of every deal.
First action
Write the one-page offer and a short NDA, and send it to the three most active open opportunities.
How to measure it
First meeting to pilot conversion
- Now
- –
- Target
- 2x
- By
- 8 weeks
Steps
Write the offer
What to share, the 48-hour promise and how data is deleted after.
Product Marketing Manager 1 day
Prepare the NDA
A short mutual NDA and data handling note.
CEO 2 days
Set the format
Side-by-side conclusions, citations, and what was missed.
Product Marketing Manager 2 days
Run it
Analysts or the platform team produce the result.
Senior ML/AI Engineer 48 hours per test
Present
A 30-minute review with the prospect.
CEO 30 minutes
Track it
Tests run, pilots started, deals won.
Product Marketing Manager weekly
Run this outreach. The sequence sent for you: addresses found and verified, replies routed to your CRM. Usually live within days.
Book a working sessionWhy it works
Offer each qualified prospect one test: share a finished study (the data and the final report) under NDA, and within 48 hours Merciv returns its own analysis with page-level citations, side by side with their conclusions, plus anything their report missed.
A VP of Consumer Insights can judge accuracy on work they already know the answer to, which removes the biggest objection (is it right?) before IT and legal review starts.
Ready to use
EmailOffer email
Subject: Send us one study you have already finished
Hi {first name},
The fastest way to judge Merciv is on work you already know the answer to. Share one finished study (the data and your final report) under NDA, and in 48 hours we will send back our analysis with page-level citations, side by side with your conclusions.
Welch's did this with about ten past reports before trusting us. Your data is deleted afterwards, and we never train on it.
Worth a try?
{name}Risks and how to handle them
Prospects will not share data before a contract
Offer a public-data version first, then the private-data test.
The result differs from the client's report
Show the reasoning and sources; a well-argued difference is also valuable.
Evidence
- HiringProduct Marketing Manager (first dedicated PMM): the buyer is "a VP of Consumer Insights" at an enterprise consumer company; the sale is "multi-stakeholder, long-cycle, and built on trust — we're asking teams to bring their proprietary data into our platform"; own the answer to "why not just use ChatGPT?", case studies, comparison content, competitor comparisons and win/loss; accountable for conversion to pipeline.Source
- Your websiteWelch's story (October 2026): a three-person insights team runs up to seven projects at once; a question-by-question survey error log in about 15 minutes; Merciv reached the same conclusions the team had reached on about ten past reports; partner-reviewed analysis signed off in days rather than weeks.Source
- Your websiteHomepage: "The compounding consumer intelligence system", connecting internal data, syndicated research and the open web; no customers named (testimonials by role only); proof figures such as "~$12M overstock prevented", "98% faster time to answer", "87% lower research cost" and "~40x more citations per query than general AI"; integrations with Nielsen, Circana, SPINS, Numerator and NIQ; agents named Unmet Needs, Line Review Prep and Dupe Watch; SOC 2 Type II and zero training on customer data; a "Celebrity Brands" signal report banner.Source