Your homepage promises teams will "reach proficiency faster", and your Series A and seed posts back that up with numbers: Podium cut new-hire ramp time in half, Crypto.com cut average handling time 18% and lifted CSAT 3%, and ActiveCampaign recovered a full year of coaching hours. None of those numbers appear on the Podium, Crypto.com or ActiveCampaign stories, or on the homepage. Seven of your eight stories report no metric at all, and the /customers page links only three of the eight, so Ryanair, the one story with a number (interview time down 50%), is missing from it. Rivals lead with numbers: Second Nature says ramp time falls 34%, and Zenarate cites a 50% onboarding cut at TruGreen.
First action
Email Podium, Crypto.com and ActiveCampaign to re-approve their figures for use on their own stories.
How to measure it
Demo conversion from homepage and /customers visits
- Now
- –
- Target
- +25%
- By
- 60 days
Steps
Re-approve the figures
Confirm the Podium, Crypto.com and ActiveCampaign numbers, their baseline and period.
Founders (CEO) 1 week
Add results strips
One number, baseline and period at the top of each story.
Founding Product Designer 2 days
Proof under the headline
Podium's halved ramp time under the homepage H1, linked to the story.
Founding Product Designer 1 day
List all eight stories
Add Ryanair, Tech Mahindra, Finom, Amenitiz and Crescendo to /customers, with use-case filters.
Senior Product Engineer 2 days
Fix the dates
Correct the ActiveCampaign and Finom date mismatches.
Founding Product Designer 1 hour
Ask for new numbers
Use the milestone method to get one figure from each of the other five customers.
Account Executive 1 month
Reuse in sales
Add the numbers to /demo, /bpo, the /vs pages and BDR sequences.
Business Development Representative 1 week
Why it works
Re-confirm the three figures with each customer, then add a results strip (one number, the baseline and the period) to the top of the Podium, Crypto.com and ActiveCampaign stories. Put "Podium halved new-hire ramp time" directly under the homepage headline, linked to the story. List all eight stories on /customers with filters for onboarding, hiring, product launches and BPO, and fix the two stories whose dates don't match. For the five stories without numbers, ask each customer for one before-and-after figure using your own time-to-proficiency milestone method.
Buyers comparing simulation vendors look for proof of the headline promise. A named customer's number next to "reach proficiency faster" does more than any feature table, and you have already published these numbers, so most of the work is approval and layout.
Ready to use
ChecklistCase-study proof checklist
[ ] Podium: ramp time cut in half (re-approved, baseline, period) [ ] Crypto.com: handling time -18%, CSAT +3% (re-approved) [ ] ActiveCampaign: a year of coaching hours recovered (re-approved) [ ] Results strip at the top of each story [ ] One number under the homepage H1 [ ] All eight stories on /customers, filterable by use case [ ] ActiveCampaign and Finom dates corrected [ ] One new figure requested from Ryanair, Tech Mahindra, Finom, Amenitiz, Crescendo
Risks and how to handle them
A customer no longer approves a figure
Publish only re-approved numbers and keep the qualitative story otherwise.
Older numbers are questioned
Show the baseline and the measurement period next to each figure.
Evidence
- Your websiteFunding posts: the Series A post ("$25 million", led by Hedosophia, April 16, 2026) and the seed post ($6.5M led by First Round Capital, June 5, 2025) both state results the case studies leave out: Crypto.com average handling time down 18% and CSAT up 3%; Podium new-hire ramp time cut in half; ActiveCampaign recovered the equivalent of a full year of coaching hours.Source
- Your websiteCase studies: of the eight stories, only Ryanair's gives a number; the Crypto.com, Podium, ActiveCampaign, Tech Mahindra, Finom, Amenitiz and Crescendo stories report no metrics. Two carry dates that don't match: ActiveCampaign (published 2025-02-23) mentions an "October 2026" review, and Finom (2025-08-07) mentions a "July 2026" discussion.Source
- Your websiteCustomers page ("How teams put practice to work.", checked November 9, 2026) links only three stories: Crypto.com, ActiveCampaign and Podium. The sitemap lists five more published stories that the page does not link: Ryanair, Tech Mahindra, Finom, Amenitiz and Crescendo.Source
- Your websiteHomepage: H1 "Help your team reach proficiency faster"; "Training simulations for sales and service teams. Practice customer conversations and software workflows together, before the real job." The only call to action is "Get a demo" (four times), and the one customer quote, from Crypto.com, has no figures. The previous headline (late 2025) was "Train and QA your human and AI agents".Source
- Competitor researchRivals' own homepages: Second Nature says customers "reduce ramp time by 34%", cites GoHealth cutting onboarding from 9 weeks to 5, is "Trusted by 2,000+ teams worldwide" and offers free role plays behind "Try Now" links; Zenarate, "The frontline performance platform for humans and AI", claims "200+ enterprise CX teams", TruGreen onboarding time cut by 50% and Sallie Mae attrition down 32%.Source