Taiga has published 71 specialty guides, but they describe themselves as "draft guides" with "No support claim is implied". On the podiatry guide, the FAQ "Does Taiga support podiatry?" is answered "This draft does not establish that.", and that sentence is also in the page's FAQ structured data. The index says Taiga only "publicly names primary care and internal medicine", while the FAQ and the cardiology guide say pediatrics, cardiology, orthopedics and mental health are supported too. Taiga's robots.txt explicitly invites answer engines to read these pages, so the hedge is what a practice owner may be told when they ask whether Taiga bills their specialty. Every guide checked ends in a single "Book a demo" with no H1, price or customer quote.
First action
List the 71 specialties in a sheet and mark each Supported, Scoped or Not yet with the billing team.
How to measure it
Specialty-page conversions (signups + booked calls)
- Now
- –
- Target
- 3x the current monthly count
- By
- 60 days
Steps
Set the statuses
Supported, Scoped or Not yet for all 71 specialties, with the claim types each status covers.
Co-founder & CEO 2 days
One source of truth
A single data file that feeds the index, each guide's status line, the FAQ and the FAQ structured data.
Founding Engineer 2 days
Rewrite the first screen
An H1 with the status, one sentence on what is in scope, the price line and a matched proof point.
Co-founder & CEO 3 days
Remove draft language
Replace "draft" and "does not establish" phrasing with the status wording; keep the compliance disclaimers that coverage is decided by payers.
Co-founder & CEO 1 day
Two calls to action
Self-serve signup for eClinicalWorks practices, "Book a fit call" for others, tagged by specialty.
Founding Engineer 1 day
Check answer engines
Ask the main assistants "Does Taiga bill podiatry / cardiology?" before and after, and record the answers.
Founding Account Executive 2 hours
Track by specialty
Signups and calls per guide in PostHog; promote the top ten guides in outreach.
Co-founder & CTO monthly
Why it works
Agree one specialty support list with three honest statuses: Supported (bill it today), Scoped (we take it after a fit review of named claim types) and Not yet. Store it in one data file that feeds the specialties index, every guide's opening line, the FAQ answer and the structured data, so the pages can no longer disagree. Rewrite each guide's first screen as an H1 with the status ("Podiatry billing: scoped. We take office visits and procedures; supplier-billed footwear is reviewed case by case"), keep the useful billing content below it, and remove the word "draft" from published copy. Under the status, add the price line, a matched quote where one exists, and two calls to action: the three-minute signup for eClinicalWorks practices and "Book a fit call" for everyone else. Start with the five specialties the FAQ already names, then work down the list.
Specialty pages catch high-intent searches ("podiatry billing company") from owners comparing partners. A clear yes or a scoped yes converts; "this draft does not establish that" reads as an unfinished company and is quoted verbatim by answer engines. One source of truth also removes the contradiction a careful buyer would spot between the FAQ and the guides, and Taiga keeps its honest tone by saying "not yet" where that is true.
Ready to use
CopySpecialty guide first screen
H1: <Specialty> billing with Taiga: <Supported | Scoped | Not yet> What we take: <claim types> What we review on a fit call: <claim types> Price: 6.5% of collections up to $2M, no setup or per-claim fees, $0 if we collect nothing Proof: <matched quote or result> [Start in 3 minutes (eClinicalWorks)] [Book a fit call] FAQ: Does Taiga bill <specialty>? <one-sentence status answer from the shared list>
Risks and how to handle them
Over-promising support for a specialty the team cannot bill well yet
Use "Scoped" generously and list the claim types reviewed on the fit call.
Losing the careful, compliant tone
Keep the payer-coverage disclaimers; change only the support answer.
Evidence
- Your websitePodiatry guide (checked twice on November 10, 2026): the FAQ "Does Taiga support podiatry?" is answered "This draft does not establish that.", and the same answer is in the page's FAQ structured data. The five guides checked (podiatry, primary care, mental health counseling, dermatology, cardiology) have no H1, no customer quote, no price and a single call to action, "Book a demo" with the founders.Source
- Your websiteSpecialty guides: the specialties sitemap lists 71 URLs, all last modified October 30, 2026. The /specialties index says "No support claim is implied by these draft guides", that Taiga "publicly names primary care and internal medicine among supported specialties", and asks visitors to have the team assess their mix, "particularly podiatry and optometry".Source
- Your websiteFAQ: "Does Taiga handle our specialty?" names primary care, pediatrics, cardiology, orthopedics and mental health "and others", with unsupported specialties disclosed upfront; owner-providers "reclaim 10 to 20 hours a week"; soft denials are resubmitted "within 48 to 72 hours"; "about half of denied claims are typically never resubmitted"; each practice gets a named account manager, with most questions answered "within 30 minutes". The cardiology guide says "Yes. Cardiology is one of the specialties Taiga names publicly."Source
- Your websiterobots.txt explicitly invites answer-engine crawlers: "We want Taiga's pages — including comparison pages — discoverable by AI Overviews" and other assistants.Source