Website review, no card needed

7kd.pl logo

7kd.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202640 issues · 84 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on 7kd.pl, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.9 sMay 23Nov 73.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Oct 31, 20263.3 s
Nov 7, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
226 ms201 msMay 23Nov 7215 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026204 ms
May 30, 2026207 ms
Jun 6, 2026211 ms
Jun 13, 2026219 ms
Jun 20, 2026218 ms
Jun 27, 2026223 ms
Jul 4, 2026222 ms
Jul 11, 2026220 ms
Jul 18, 2026218 ms
Jul 25, 2026214 ms
Aug 1, 2026213 ms
Aug 8, 2026211 ms
Aug 15, 2026217 ms
Aug 22, 2026218 ms
Aug 29, 2026220 ms
Sep 5, 2026220 ms
Sep 12, 2026214 ms
Sep 19, 2026210 ms
Sep 26, 2026206 ms
Oct 3, 2026207 ms
Oct 10, 2026211 ms
Oct 17, 2026215 ms
Oct 24, 2026217 ms
Oct 31, 2026216 ms
Nov 7, 2026215 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of 7kd.pl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. 7kd.pl at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. 7kd.pl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. 7kd.pl at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. 7kd.pl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. 7kd.pl at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. 7kd.pl at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. 7kd.pl at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. 7kd.pl at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

9 to fix61
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.1 s · 681 KiB

    About 681 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 235 KiB

    69 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (235 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, TikTok and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 670 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 388 ms

    388 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 694 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 32 KiB

    About 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,222 HTML elements

    The page has 2,222 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    280 ms · 54 KiB

    54 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 120 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    35 KiB

    3 images could be 35 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify CSS

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 766 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 115 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    Your largest element takes 14.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Informujemy, iż w celu realizacji usług dostępnych w naszym…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.3 s

    14.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 229 ms

    229 ms

    Real visitors wait 229 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 23 images without width and height

    23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 226 ms

    226 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 226 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 215 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 114 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 114 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (44), fonts 346 KiB (8) and images 219 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (45 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (99 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 70.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7889
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 27 text elements with low contrast

    27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9282
  • Title is long (76 characters)

    Your title is 76 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Sklep z dywanami - Dywany online - Sklep internetowy - Dywany sklep - 7kd.pl”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 387 internal links, 41 external

    The homepage links to 387 pages on 7kd.pl and 41 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Sklep internetowy z dywanami, chodnikami. Hurtownia dywanów i salon sprzedaży. ✔️ Dywany nowoczesne, ✔️ dziecięce, ✔️ e…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Sklep internetowy z dywanami – bogaty wybór, atrakcyjne ceny”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://7kd.pl/1_index_sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://7kd.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,309 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://7kd.pl/content/29-propozycja is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://7kd.pl/content/29-propozycja, https://7kd.pl/31-kolekcje, https://7kd.pl/320-lara, https://7kd.pl/291-vintage and https://7kd.pl/353-sienna have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 188 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,722 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,722 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 10 short forms

    10 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 7kd.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
PrestaShop
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
LH.pl Sp. z o.o.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on 7kd.pl, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25