Website review, no card needed
anapan.ro website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202643 issues · 106 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on anapan.ro, 20 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #44,035 of 80,572 reviewed websitesbeats 40%
- #25,145 of 39,629 online storesbeats 31%
- #36 of 133 PrestaShop storesbeats 69%
Closest competitors among PrestaShop stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.3 s · 8.9 MB135 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.9 MB).
Improve image delivery
6.3 s · 5.4 MB28 images could be 5.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.4 s · 677 KiBAbout 677 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Clarity and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 559 ms
559 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 559 ms of main-thread work and 512 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
380 ms · 115 KiB115 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,707 HTML elements
The page has 2,707 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google CDN adds 158 ms
158 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 158 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
160 ms · 56 KiBAbout 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 186 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
80 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
5 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 5 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
1 checks passed
Server response: 120 ms
120 msYour server sent the HTML in 120 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 39.3 s
39.3 sYour largest element takes 39.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “…”.
Speed Index: 15.8 s
15.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 41.0 s
41.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
76 images without width and height
76 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 353 ms
353 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 353 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 153 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 154 ms
154 msReal visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.069
0.069The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.069, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.1 MB in 176 requests
10.1 MBYour homepage downloads 10.1 MB in 176 requests on a phone: images 8.3 MB (81), scripts 1.3 MB (38) and fonts 298 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 2.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
1.1 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 13.png at 800 px wide, shown at 208 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.
28 images in older formats
28 images (6.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (3.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit
2.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.86 g of CO₂e: 343.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 83 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
182 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 182 pages on anapan.ro and 8 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 79 characters
Your meta description is 79 characters: “Patiserie proaspat coapta, Cofetarie inovativa, Brutarie artizanala - Bucuresti”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Cofetarie si brutarie artizanala in Bucuresti”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Create zilnic cu multa dragoste - Ana Pan”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.anapan.ro/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.anapan.ro/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Opted out of AI training for 2 crawlers
robots.txt blocks Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,738 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (83 KiB, 338 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
/cos declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and /cos all use the title “Create zilnic cu multa dragoste - Ana Pan”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages slow to respond
/dulce-de-halloween, /patiserie-brutarie and /patiserie-sarata took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
80 distorted images
80 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.
6 low-resolution images
6 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
250 of 255 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (anapan.ro).
Valid certificate (69 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for anapan.ro and is valid for another 69 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://anapan.ro redirects to the secure version.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
anapan.ro has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,730 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,730 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
62 short forms
62 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 2 email links.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be anapan.ro is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:185.163.105.5 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 3.3.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- PrestaShop
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 43 issues on anapan.ro, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.