Website review, no card needed

agaval.com logo

agaval.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202654 issues · 111 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on agaval.com, 27 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s3.2 sMay 9Oct 243.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
313 ms264 msMay 9Oct 24279 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026307 ms
May 16, 2026302 ms
May 23, 2026300 ms
May 30, 2026302 ms
Jun 6, 2026302 ms
Jun 13, 2026303 ms
Jun 20, 2026303 ms
Jun 27, 2026298 ms
Jul 4, 2026287 ms
Jul 11, 2026279 ms
Jul 18, 2026272 ms
Jul 25, 2026270 ms
Aug 1, 2026272 ms
Aug 8, 2026273 ms
Aug 15, 2026277 ms
Aug 22, 2026281 ms
Aug 29, 2026286 ms
Sep 5, 2026285 ms
Sep 12, 2026288 ms
Sep 19, 2026287 ms
Sep 26, 2026286 ms
Oct 3, 2026284 ms
Oct 10, 2026278 ms
Oct 17, 2026277 ms
Oct 24, 2026279 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of agaval.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. agaval.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. agaval.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  3. agaval.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  4. agaval.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  5. agaval.com at 6.9 s6.9 s
  6. agaval.com at 8.3 s8.3 s
  7. agaval.com at 9.7 s9.7 s
  8. agaval.com at 11.1 s11.1 s

agaval.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

13 to fix13
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.2 s · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.0 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.0 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.4 s · 565 KiB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (565 KiB).

  • vtexassets.com adds 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 1.8 s of main-thread work and 5.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 10.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 13

    13/100

    Your mobile performance score is 13 (desktop: 31). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,526 HTML elements

    The page has 3,526 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google Tag Manager and ZenDesk and others), adding 7.8 MB and 4.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    4.0 MB

    17 images could be 4.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 710 ms

    710 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 710 ms of main-thread work and 540 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 625 ms

    625 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 625 ms of main-thread work and 474 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Insider adds 384 ms

    384 ms

    Insider costs a phone 384 ms of main-thread work and 686 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 442 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 56 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 42 ms

    42 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 42 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.73

    0.73

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.73 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.4 s

    24.4 s

    Your largest element takes 24.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 15.6 s

    15.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.4 s

    28.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.279

    0.279

    The layout shifts by 0.279 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 245 ms

    245 ms

    Real visitors wait 245 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 48 images without width and height

    48 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 307 ms to 279 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 555 ms

    555 ms

    Real visitors wait 555 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 8.4 MB in 357 requests

    8.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.4 MB in 357 requests on a phone: images 4.3 MB (35), scripts 2.6 MB (95) and fonts 979 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.37 g of CO₂e: 284.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8188
  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (11 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (6 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9278
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (225 characters)

    Your meta description is 225 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 11 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 11 pages on agaval.com and 1 external page.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 36 characters

    Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “Agaval marca colombiana multiformato”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.agaval.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.agaval.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    3%

    A phone browser shows 759 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 22. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /5863 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    /lo-nuevo, /ofertas, /revistas, /servicio-al-cliente and /5863 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    /lo-nuevo, /mundo-moda, /tecnologia, /muebles and /5863 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    /lo-nuevo, /mundo-moda, /ofertas and /revistas have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    /mundo-moda, /ofertas and /tecnologia took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 9 internal pages checked

    We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7374
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.agaval.com/.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'getRegistrations')”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    104 of 110 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix81
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://agaval.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (agaval.com).

  • Valid certificate (25 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for agaval.com and is valid for another 25 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 12 links work

    All 12 links checked from your homepage (11 internal, 1 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    agaval.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    agaval.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 18 years old

    18 years

    agaval.com was registered in Nov 2007 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Nov 2028

    agaval.com is registered until Nov 2028.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 759 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 759 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

Email authentication

1 to fix50
  • No DMARC policy

    agaval.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • Email authentication score: 50/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 45 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on agaval.com, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25