Website review, no card needed
airpot.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202648 issues · 112 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on airpot.com, 20 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #70,877 of 81,078 reviewed websitesbeats 11%
- #37,218 of 40,017 online storesbeats 6%
- #1,755 of 2,107 WooCommerce storesbeats 14%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 224 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.3 s · 4.4 MB77 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.7 s · 565 KiBAbout 565 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 39
39/100Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.4 s
A phone's processor spends 5.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 399 ms
399 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 399 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 328 ms
328 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 468 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Minify CSS
150 ms · 23 KiB23 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
111 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify JavaScript
45 KiB45 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
14 KiB3 images could be 14 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 125 ms
125 msYour server sent the HTML in 125 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.6 s
5.6 sReal visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 19.4 s
19.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 33.8 s
33.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s
7.2 sYour largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Airpel - FFR (Filter-Filter Regulator)”.
Total Blocking Time: 711 ms
711 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 711 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 224 ms
224 msReal visitors wait 224 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 68% slower for real visitors
+68%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 124 ms to 224 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 5.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 116 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 116 requests on a phone: scripts 4.3 MB (45), stylesheets 637 KiB (20) and fonts 506 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (23 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.83 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.83 g of CO₂e: 219.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
55 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 55 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (67 characters)
Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Customizable Precision Pneumatic Control | Cylinder Design | Airpot”.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
99 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 99 pages on airpot.com and 8 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “Discover the unique design of our low-friction air cylinders that have accurate output forces and can be used with a wi…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “AIRPOT CORPORATION COMPANY”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.airpot.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.airpot.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (977 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
12 linked pages hidden from search
/product-category/product-lines, /product-category/product-lines/pneumatic-actuation, /product-category/product-lines/dashpots-shock-absorbers, /product-category/product-lines/piston-cylinder-sets, /product-category/product-lines/airpel-ffr-filter-filter-filter-regulator and /product-category/product-lines/gramforce-grippers and 6 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages without a meta description
/product-category/product-lines/airpel-ffr-filter-filter-filter-regulator and /product-category/product-lines/airpel-sensors have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (airpot.com).
Valid certificate (50 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for airpot.com and is valid for another 50 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://airpot.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 83 days
airpot.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
airpot.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
airpot.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsairpot.com was registered in Jan 1996 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 689 words of copy
The homepage carries about 689 words of visible text.
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SIGN UP” and “Contact”.
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Sign up”, “Apply a Precision Force” and “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
airpot.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 40/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 5 plugins are behind their latest release.contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.2 · siteorigin-panels 2.36.0 → 2.37.0 · woocommerce 11.1.0 → 11.2.1 · gdpr-cookie-compliance 5.1.0 → 5.2.2 · profile-builder 4.0.1 → 4.0.4
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 48 issues on airpot.com, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.