Website review, no card needed

allnex.com logo

allnex.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202633 issues · 99 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on allnex.com, 7 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s3.1 sMay 2Oct 173.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.0 s
May 9, 20263.9 s
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
126 ms90 msMay 2Oct 17106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202697 ms
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 202698 ms
Jun 6, 2026100 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 202699 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026122 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026115 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026107 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of allnex.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. allnex.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. allnex.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. allnex.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. allnex.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. allnex.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. allnex.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. allnex.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. allnex.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

allnex.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

3 to fix93
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 505 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (505 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    256 KiB

    About 256 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 45 KiB

    About 45 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    31 KiB

    1 image could be 31 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    17 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Lead Forensics), adding 1 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 93

    93/100

    Your mobile performance score is 93 (desktop: 96). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 188 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 107 ms

    107 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 107 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Your largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This website uses cookies. While some of them are necessary…”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.9 s).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 97 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Real visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.018

    0.018

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.018, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 44 ms

    44 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 44 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (107 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.20 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.20 g of CO₂e: 23.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 711 KiB in 16 requests

    711 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 711 KiB in 16 requests on a phone: scripts 456 KiB (6), images 108 KiB (2) and stylesheets 50 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7991
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9292
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 190 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 190 pages on allnex.com and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “Allnex, the global leader in industrial coating resins. A market-leading manufacturer of adhesives, sealants and specia…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “for all nex›t generations”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Allnex | Global Leader In Coating Resins & Additives - allnex”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://allnex.com/en/sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,025 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix69
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /en/contact-us is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    /en and / all use the title “Allnex | Global Leader In Coating Resins & Additives - allnex”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /en/careers has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /en/contact-us and /en/markets-applications use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /en/markets-applications/paint-coatings/coating-additives/defoamers-deaerators, whose canonical is /en/markets-applications/paint-coatings/coating-additives/defoamers-and-deaerators. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    /media-room, /en/markets-applications, /en/markets-applications/performance-applications/additives, /markets-applications/paint-coatings/coating-additives/catalysts, /en/markets-applications/paint-coatings/coating-additives/defoamers-deaerators and /en/markets-applications/paint-coatings/coating-additives/dispersants-wetting and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 154 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 8197
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (allnex.com).

  • Valid certificate (191 days left)

    The certificate from GoDaddy.com · GoDaddy TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 verifies for allnex.com and is valid for another 191 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://allnex.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 52 links work

    All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    allnex.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    allnex.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 26 years old

    26 years

    allnex.com was registered in May 2000 through Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    allnex.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 400 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 400 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Contact Allnex”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

Company

Headquarters
Brussels metropolitan area

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 33 issues on allnex.com, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25