Website review, no card needed
allocommunications.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202648 issues · 109 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on allocommunications.com, 21 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 205 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 210 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 222 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 348 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 345 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.3 s
1.3 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 913 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 10.9 s
A phone's processor spends 10.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 23
23/100Your mobile performance score is 23 (desktop: 56). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Olark and others), adding 3.6 MB and 4.1 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 1.8 MB12 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 932 KiB61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (932 KiB).
Google CDN adds 707 ms
707 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 707 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Olark adds 637 ms
637 msOlark costs a phone 637 ms of main-thread work and 473 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 472 ms
472 msFacebook costs a phone 472 ms of main-thread work and 285 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 482 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 152 KiBAbout 152 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Hubspot adds 291 ms
291 msHubspot costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 141 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,443 HTML elements
The page has 2,443 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
115 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 115 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 56 but mobile only 23. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.1 s
18.1 sYour largest element takes 18.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “ALLO Fiber service truck in the community”.
Time to Interactive: 35.3 s
35.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.4 s
3.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.5 s
11.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 400 ms
400 msReal visitors wait 400 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 70% slower for real visitors
+70%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 205 ms to 345 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 56% slower for real visitors
+56%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.118
0.118The layout shifts by 0.118 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
1 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 217 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 217 requests on a phone: scripts 3.9 MB (82), images 2.0 MB (46) and other files 453 KiB (61). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images far larger than shown
1.3 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mobile2.jpeg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 84 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.95 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.95 g of CO₂e: 234.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
51 text elements with low contrast
51 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 30 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (CableOrSatelliteService, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
412 internal links, 25 external
The homepage links to 412 pages on allocommunications.com and 25 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “Connect to the faster home internet provider in your area. Switch to ALLO's high-speed 100% fiber internet network that…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Internet built for you.”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “High-Speed Fiber Home Internet, TV & Phone | ALLO Fiber”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.allocommunications.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.allocommunications.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,111 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 158 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 broken images
6 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.allocommunications.com/.
7 small tap targets
7 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (allocommunications.com).
Valid certificate (84 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for allocommunications.com and is valid for another 84 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://allocommunications.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 60 links work
All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
allocommunications.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 17 years old
17 yearsallocommunications.com was registered in Oct 2008 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only amazonaws.com, digicert.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for allocommunications.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Oct 2027
allocommunications.com is registered until Oct 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
A 12-field form
Your longest form asks for 12 fields (8 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 805 words of copy
The homepage carries about 805 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Support & Contact”, “Toggle Support & Contact menu” and “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, 1 customer or partner logo and 11 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:69.169.238.42 ip4:69.169.238.43 ip4:141.193.213.10 ip4:141.193.213.11 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
53 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 53 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on allocommunications.com, including 29 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.