Website review, no card needed

appeon.com logo

appeon.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202641 issues · 106 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on appeon.com, 15 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.9 s2.8 sMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.7 s
May 30, 20264.5 s
Jun 6, 20264.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.6 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
251 ms98 msMay 2Oct 17148 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026134 ms
May 9, 2026140 ms
May 16, 2026153 ms
May 23, 2026164 ms
May 30, 2026141 ms
Jun 6, 2026141 ms
Jun 13, 2026123 ms
Jun 20, 2026116 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026131 ms
Jul 18, 2026136 ms
Jul 25, 2026157 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026171 ms
Aug 15, 2026222 ms
Aug 22, 2026224 ms
Aug 29, 2026233 ms
Sep 5, 2026178 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026125 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026125 ms
Oct 10, 2026124 ms
Oct 17, 2026148 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of appeon.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. appeon.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. appeon.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. appeon.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. appeon.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. appeon.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. appeon.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. appeon.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. appeon.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

appeon.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix58
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 399 KiB

    About 399 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 287 KiB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (287 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Olark, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and others), adding 979 KiB and 893 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 603 KiB

    4 images could be 603 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 98 KiB

    About 98 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Olark adds 358 ms

    358 ms

    Olark costs a phone 358 ms of main-thread work and 440 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 333 ms

    333 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 333 ms of main-thread work and 446 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 58. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 988 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 28 ms

    28 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 28 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Your largest element takes 15.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Cloud App Development, Simplified. A simpler, faster, open-…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 134 ms to 148 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Real visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 126 ms

    126 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 126 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 67 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 67 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (24), images 859 KiB (19) and fonts 242 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (816 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    365 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example news02-3.webp at 1,312 px wide, shown at 186 px. Resized copies would save about 365 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (315 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.64 g of CO₂e: 76.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9192
  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is long (80 characters)

    Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Rapidly Develop Cloud Apps Based on .NET Core with PowerBuilder | Appeon Website”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 94 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on appeon.com and 16 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “PowerBuilder, .NET DataStore, PowerServer, and PowerScript Migrator make the development of client/server apps, cloud a…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Cloud App Development, Simplified.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.appeon.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.appeon.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (823 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix60
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /events, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /products/snapobjects, /elevate and /news have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /elevate, whose canonical is /conference/elevate/2026. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /elevate has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.appeon.com/.

  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix88
  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.appeon.com/events (500).

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.appeon.com/freetrial?product=pb.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1;mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (appeon.com).

  • Valid certificate (71 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert, Inc. · GeoTrust G2 TLS CN RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA1 verifies for appeon.com and is valid for another 71 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://appeon.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    appeon.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    appeon.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 26 years old

    26 years

    appeon.com was registered in May 2000 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2030

    appeon.com is registered until Sep 2030.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 319 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 319 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More” and “Request a Tech Meeting”.

  • 20 calls to action

    The homepage has 20 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Pricing” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:sendgrid.net include:fdspfus.freshemail.io include:_spf.google.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Drupal 9 (https://www.drupal.org)
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity

Company

Founded
1992

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on appeon.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25