Website review, no card needed
applitools.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202640 issues · 104 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on applitools.com, 13 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 190 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 186 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 244 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and Facebook and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 681 KiBAbout 681 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
500 ms · 414 KiB24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (414 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 399 ms
399 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 399 ms of main-thread work and 385 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.1 s
A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 282 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
ZenDesk adds 240 ms
240 msZenDesk costs a phone 240 ms of main-thread work and 414 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 49 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 25 KiB1 image could be 25 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 60. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 16.7 s
16.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 679 ms
679 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 679 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 237 ms
237 msReal visitors wait 237 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 190 ms to 244 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sYour largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Your team ships more code than it can review and test. Appl…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.2 MB in 124 requests
2.2 MBYour homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 124 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (55), images 273 KiB (16) and fonts 68 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.61 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
20 images without alt text
20 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (42 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 42 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“AI writes code fast.Know it works and looks right.”, “Customer Testimonials” and ““Applitools has become essential to our process. …”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (225 characters)
Your meta description is 225 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://app14743.cloudwayssites.com/)”.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at applitools.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
104 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 104 pages on applitools.com and 23 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 33 characters
Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Applitools | AI-Augmented Testing”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://applitools.com/.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://applitools.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (995 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (8 KiB, 65 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
/platform/integrations, /platform/analyze, /solutions/visual-testing, /solutions/agentic-testing, /solutions/functional-testing and /solutions/cross-browser-testing and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
/resources/webinars/optimizely-cms-visual-testing, /platform/eyes, /platform/autonomous, /platform/integrations and /platform/whats-new have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
/platform/integrations and /platform/whats-new took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26013339&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=4ae7764d-ec49-4e68-938a-3675ec220437&bo=1&sid=23f5aad0cfce11f1a4b6b5b41048f272&vid=23f5f0c0cfce11f19b794f3ebddc85c7&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://applitools.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.facebook.com/pages/Applitools/163528770501019.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (applitools.com).
Valid certificate (129 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 verifies for applitools.com and is valid for another 129 days.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 56 links work
All 56 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 16 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
applitools.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
applitools.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 14 years old
14 yearsapplitools.com was registered in Apr 2012 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
applitools.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 771 words of copy
The homepage carries about 771 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Schedule a demo” and “Start your free trial”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Start trial” and “Schedule a demo”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:mktomail.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:stsp…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector2” and “dkim”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
38 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Employees
- 120
- Headquarters
- Tel Aviv
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on applitools.com, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.