Website review, no card needed
appodeal.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202637 issues · 105 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on appodeal.com, 19 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 365 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 357 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 353 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 352 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 355 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 368 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 371 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 371 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 368 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 348 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 366 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 368 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 361 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 371 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 373 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 373 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 456 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
appodeal.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 491 KiBAbout 491 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 365 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (365 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 75). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 772 ms
772 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 772 ms of main-thread work and 678 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hotjar adds 441 ms
441 msHotjar costs a phone 441 ms of main-thread work and 65 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 113 KiB2 images could be 113 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 278 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 252 ms
252 msFacebook costs a phone 252 ms of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,897 HTML elements
The page has 1,897 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 75 but mobile only 37. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 157 ms
157 msYour server sent the HTML in 157 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 515 ms
515 msReal visitors wait 515 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.2 s
10.2 sYour largest element takes 10.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We and our business partners use technologies, including co…”.
Time to Interactive: 13.8 s
13.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 365 ms to 456 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.026
0.026The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.026, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.1 MB in 61 requests
6.1 MBYour homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 61 requests on a phone: media 4.5 MB (1), scripts 1.2 MB (25) and images 276 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.74 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.74 g of CO₂e: 208.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
23 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 23 pages on appodeal.com and 18 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 146 characters
Your meta description is 146 characters: “Appodeal is a top mobile app marketing platform for app & game developers. Establish & scale a profitable mobile app or…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Engineering beyond autocomplete”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Top-Earning Mobile App Mediation Solution – Appodeal”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://appodeal.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://appodeal.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (410 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
/career has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
4 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 2 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://appodeal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/main-quote-jakub-sobun.webp.
11 small tap targets
11 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
3 links through redirect chains
3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://bidmachine.io/.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (appodeal.com).
Valid certificate (147 days left)
The certificate from GoDaddy.com, Inc. · Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2 verifies for appodeal.com and is valid for another 147 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://appodeal.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 29 links work
All 29 links checked from your homepage (16 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
appodeal.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
appodeal.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 13 years old
13 yearsappodeal.com was registered in May 2013 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2028
appodeal.com is registered until May 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: “1M downloads”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 661 words of copy
The homepage carries about 661 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Sign up” and “Get started”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 11 open roles
- Teams
- Holding: Finance (3), Executive Team (2), Holding: Administrative team (2), Gaming Monetization (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
Company
- Employees
- 300
- Headquarters
- San Francisco
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on appodeal.com, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.