Website review, no card needed
applovin.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202640 issues · 100 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on applovin.com, 14 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 19.2 MB in 181 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for AppLovin
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 183 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 343 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 351 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 383 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 443 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.5 s
2.3 s
3.1 s
3.9 s
4.6 s
5.4 s
6.2 s
applovin.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 10.3 MB106 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.8 MB29 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 3.0 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 961 KiBAbout 961 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 67
67/100Your mobile performance score is 67. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 800 ms
800 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 800 ms of main-thread work and 933 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 372 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
axon.ai adds 23 ms
23 msaxon.ai costs a phone 23 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
70 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 70 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
57 KiBAbout 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Speed Index: 25.3 s
25.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 25.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 59.1 s
59.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 59.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 969 ms
969 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 969 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 431 ms
431 msReal visitors wait 431 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 129% slower for real visitors
+129%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 443 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sYour largest element renders in 1.8 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Get started”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005
0.005The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.2 MB in 181 requests
19.2 MBYour homepage downloads 19.2 MB in 181 requests on a phone: media 8.2 MB (2), fonts 6.1 MB (15) and scripts 2.6 MB (58). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
12 images far larger than shown
935 KiB12 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example img-home-outro-quote-plateful.webp at 1,290 px wide, shown at 226 px. Resized copies would save about 935 KiB.
22 images below the first screen load straight away
22 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit
5.45 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.45 g of CO₂e: 654.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 102 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and SoftwareApplication) but with 2 problems, for example “SoftwareApplication: no offers (price) block”.
40 internal links, 28 external
The homepage links to 40 pages on applovin.com and 28 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “Reach over a billion daily users in mobile games. AppLovin helps consumer brands and gaming apps scale their business p…”.
Title: 49 characters
Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “AppLovin | Advertising solutions built for growth”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://applovin.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://axon.ai/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (444 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages point its canonical at the homepage
/en/monetization, /consumer-brands, /en/gaming-apps, /en/consumer-brands, /en/agencies and /en/book-a-call and 9 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
5 pages share 2 titles
/en, /en/brand and /en/partner all use the title “AppLovin | Advertising solutions built for growth”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages share a meta description
/consumer-brands and /en/consumer-brands use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 pages without an H1
/consumer-brands, /en/gaming-apps, /en/consumer-brands, /en/agencies, /en/ad-experience and /en/game-inventory and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/en/book-a-call has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187280530&Ver=2&mid=5d3fe23c-ab98-4db6-934b-318701adab75&bo=1&sid=11445a20d73711f1a56c8f57e503f288&vid=11448740d73711f1be397facaf3d904b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://applovin.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://apps.shopify.com/axon?st_source=autocomplete&surface_detail=autocomplete_apps.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (applovin.com).
Valid certificate (43 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for applovin.com and is valid for another 43 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 29 links work
All 29 links checked from your homepage (16 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
applovin.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
applovin.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 15 years old
15 yearsapplovin.com was registered in Jul 2011 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2027
applovin.com is registered until Jul 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 227 words
The homepage has only about 227 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get started” and “Start chat”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “.css-31l7gp{min-width:0;}Book a call”, “.css-31l7gp{min-width:0;}Get started” and “Book a strategy callarrow_outward”.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.tipalti.com include:mailsenders.netsuite.com include:52…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
42 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Hiring
- Hiring
- 43 open roles
- Teams
- Business Development - Consumer (15), Growth Marketing (8), Platform Engineering (8), Business Operations - Gaming (3)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- applovin.com/en/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Employees
- 392
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- Palo Alto
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on applovin.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.