Website review, no card needed
assembly.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202636 issues · 100 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on assembly.org, 15 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 194 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 190 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 114 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 s · 3.0 MB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 2.9 MB6 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 395 KiBAbout 395 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 2.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 81). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 249 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Optanon), adding 265 KiB and 135 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 81 but mobile only 48. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.8 s
A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.1 s
17.1 sYour largest element takes 17.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Backdrop”.
Speed Index: 11.9 s
11.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 17.7 s
17.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 390 ms
390 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 390 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 114 ms
114 msReal visitors wait 114 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 435 ms
435 msReal visitors wait 435 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 41% faster for real visitors
-41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 194 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 54 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 54 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (9), scripts 785 KiB (19) and fonts 293 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
628 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example EmmiEkberg-ASMS26-8947.jpg at 2,048 px wide, shown at 374 px. Resized copies would save about 628 KiB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (3.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.18 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
17 links without text
17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (8 characters)
Your title is only 8 characters: “Assembly”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
55 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 55 pages on assembly.org and 15 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 113 characters
Your meta description is 113 characters: “Assembly is the biggest gaming festival in Finland, where gaming, esports, digital culture and art come together.”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.assembly.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (230 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/discord is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages share a title
/en, / and /discord all use the title “Assembly”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages share a meta description
/, /en/events/assembly-x-powerpark-2026, /en/about, /en/about/contact, /en/party-guide and /en/about/become-an-organizer and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
/ and /discord have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/en/events has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
2 pages slow to respond
/en/about/volunteer-crews and /en/info-for-parents took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
15 small tap targets
15 of 29 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.tiketti.fi/assembly-winter-2027-helsingin-messukeskus-helsinki-tickets/119707.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (assembly.org).
Valid certificate (33 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for assembly.org and is valid for another 33 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://assembly.org redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 39 links work
All 39 links checked from your homepage (30 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
assembly.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
assembly.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsassembly.org was registered in Dec 1995 through DNC Holdings, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Dec 2029
assembly.org is registered until Dec 2029.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 164 words
The homepage has only about 164 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BUY TICKETS”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Sign up”.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be assembly.org is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:212.226.90.224/27 ip4:194.142.149.64/27 ip4:85.188.0.0/22 ip6:2001:67c:15c:1::/64 ip6:2001:67c:15c:63::/64 m…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Vercel
Hiring
- Hiring
- 4 open roles
- Teams
- Sales (2), Engineering (1), Product (1)
- Job board
- ashby
- Careers page
- jobs.ashbyhq.com/assembly (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 36 issues on assembly.org, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.