Website review, no card needed

atomstack.net logo

atomstack.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202647 issues · 90 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on atomstack.net, 12 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 28.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s2.1 sMay 23Nov 72.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Nov 7, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
330 ms206 msMay 23Nov 7302 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026220 ms
May 30, 2026225 ms
Jun 6, 2026243 ms
Jun 13, 2026254 ms
Jun 20, 2026268 ms
Jun 27, 2026282 ms
Jul 4, 2026293 ms
Jul 11, 2026308 ms
Jul 18, 2026308 ms
Jul 25, 2026305 ms
Aug 1, 2026302 ms
Aug 8, 2026300 ms
Aug 15, 2026306 ms
Aug 22, 2026316 ms
Aug 29, 2026316 ms
Sep 5, 2026310 ms
Sep 12, 2026310 ms
Sep 19, 2026304 ms
Sep 26, 2026305 ms
Oct 3, 2026312 ms
Oct 10, 2026312 ms
Oct 17, 2026312 ms
Oct 24, 2026310 ms
Oct 31, 2026307 ms
Nov 7, 2026302 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of atomstack.net (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. atomstack.net at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. atomstack.net at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. atomstack.net at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. atomstack.net at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. atomstack.net at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. atomstack.net at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. atomstack.net at 6.2 s6.2 s
  8. atomstack.net at 7.1 s7.1 s

Speed

14 to fix45
  • Main-thread work: 28.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 28.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 11.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Clarity adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Clarity costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 32 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5,437 HTML elements

    The page has 5,437 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, reddit and Shopify and others), adding 2.5 MB and 3.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 941 KiB

    About 941 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • reddit adds 699 ms

    699 ms

    reddit costs a phone 699 ms of main-thread work and 33 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    570 ms · 118 KiB

    About 118 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 570 ms faster on a phone.

  • Shopify adds 541 ms

    541 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 541 ms of main-thread work and 881 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • loox.io adds 486 ms

    486 ms

    loox.io costs a phone 486 ms of main-thread work and 624 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    301 KiB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (301 KiB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 296 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • azurefd.net adds 96 ms

    96 ms

    azurefd.net costs a phone 96 ms of main-thread work and 329 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    24 KiB

    2 images could be 24 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.5 s

    27.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Halloween Sale: Buy More,Save More.”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 938 ms

    938 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 938 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 272 ms

    272 ms

    Real visitors wait 272 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 37% slower for real visitors

    +37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 302 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 589 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 589 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (202), other files 1.5 MB (293) and images 787 KiB (63). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    AtomStack_SWIFT-banner750x1080_1.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.53 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.53 g of CO₂e: 184.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 9390
  • 14 text elements with low contrast

    14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (4 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 20 links without text

    20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 294 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 23 links with vague text

    23 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Meta description is long (258 characters)

    Your meta description is 258 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 582 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 582 pages on atomstack.net and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “AtomStack”.

  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Laser Engravers & Laser Cutters for Creators | AtomStack Official”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://atomstack.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://atomstack.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,679 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://atomstack.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://atomstack.com/pages/halloween-sale has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://atomstack.com/products/atomstack-p1, https://atomstack.com/pages/halloween-sale, https://atomstack.com/collections/a-series, https://atomstack.com/products/atomstack-a70-max, https://atomstack.com/products/atomstack-ace-a40-pro-v2-laser-engraver and https://atomstack.com/products/atomstack-ace-pro-v2 and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 165 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,158 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,158 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Halloween Sale: Buy More,Save More.”.

  • 29 calls to action

    The homepage has 29 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Order Tracking” and “Learn More”.

  • 7 short forms

    7 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 31 cookies set on arrival

    31

    Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 50 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 50 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at atomstack.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 22 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Transcy · Seolab · Impact Com · Microsoft Clarity · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Hulk Form Builder · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Forms · Pushowl · Revenuehunt · Simple Social Login · Addrevenue · Freegifts · Essentials Estimated Delivery · goaffpro.com · loox.io · bogos.io · richpanel.com · cloudfront.net · mambasms.com · amazonaws.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on atomstack.net, including 25 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25