Website review, no card needed
bardot.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202650 issues · 108 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on bardot.com, 15 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #58,996 of 80,655 reviewed websitesbeats 23%
- #32,323 of 39,682 online storesbeats 15%
- #125 of 257 Salesforce Commerce Cloud storesbeats 48%
Closest competitors among Salesforce Commerce Cloud stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 124 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.9 s
1.3 s
1.8 s
2.2 s
2.6 s
3.1 s
3.5 s
bardot.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.2 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.1 s · 766 KiB36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (766 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and Yotpo and others), adding 2.2 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
740 ms · 106 KiBAbout 106 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 394 ms
394 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 394 ms of main-thread work and 535 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 50 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 50 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
ZenDesk adds 281 ms
281 msZenDesk costs a phone 281 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Yotpo adds 213 ms
213 msYotpo costs a phone 213 ms of main-thread work and 538 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
259 KiB2 images could be 259 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
1,904 HTML elements
The page has 1,904 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 159 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 16 ms
16 msYour server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.6 s
23.6 sYour largest element takes 23.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Banner”.
Time to Interactive: 24.2 s
24.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sThe first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 917 ms
917 msReal visitors wait 917 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 421 ms
421 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 421 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 154 ms
154 msReal visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 22% faster for real visitors
-22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 124 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.3 MB in 145 requests
8.3 MBYour homepage downloads 8.3 MB in 145 requests on a phone: media 4.3 MB (3), scripts 2.5 MB (63) and images 821 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
194 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example zlrmjz7h2sjcxvxoevde.webp at 1,840 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 194 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (326 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images in older formats
2 images (266 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.36 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.36 g of CO₂e: 282.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
5 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
102 links crawlers can't follow
102 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Meta description is long (167 characters)
Your meta description is 167 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
166 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 166 pages on bardot.com and 19 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Bardot Ladies Clothing & Accessories | Bardot”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.usa.bardot.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.usa.bardot.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (758 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
/membership.html, /new-in/jeans/wide-jean, /new-in/tops/bodysuits, /new-in/tops/party-tops and /new-in/tops/shirts-and-blouses have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/membership.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 115 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
No HTML doctype
The page has no <!DOCTYPE html>, so browsers render it in quirks mode.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (usa.bardot.com).
Valid certificate (20 days left)
The certificate from Corporation Service Company · Corporation Service Company RSA OV SSL CA 2 verifies for bardot.com and is valid for another 20 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://bardot.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 50 links work
All 50 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 10 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
bardot.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
bardot.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearsbardot.com was registered in May 2000 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
bardot.com is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 252 words of copy
The homepage carries about 252 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP BARDOT JUNIOR”.
21 calls to action
The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “shop bardot junior”, “Shop By new in” and “Shop By dresses”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.tmes.trendmicro.com include:mail.zendesk.com ip4:203.110.136.128/…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Pinterest Tag and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
32 cookies set on arrival
32Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Securityservices
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on bardot.com, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.