Website review, no card needed

beamtx.com logo

beamtx.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202638 issues · 103 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on beamtx.com, 13 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: 1 image over 500 KB. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s853 msMay 16Oct 311.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026955 ms
May 23, 2026947 ms
May 30, 2026958 ms
Jun 6, 2026934 ms
Jun 13, 2026921 ms
Jun 20, 2026907 ms
Jun 27, 2026917 ms
Jul 4, 2026925 ms
Jul 11, 2026917 ms
Jul 18, 2026908 ms
Jul 25, 2026909 ms
Aug 1, 2026894 ms
Aug 8, 2026900 ms
Aug 15, 2026900 ms
Aug 22, 2026891 ms
Aug 29, 2026887 ms
Sep 5, 2026874 ms
Sep 12, 2026884 ms
Sep 19, 2026904 ms
Sep 26, 2026952 ms
Oct 3, 2026981 ms
Oct 10, 2026957 ms
Oct 17, 2026986 ms
Oct 24, 2026957 ms
Oct 31, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
93 ms77 msMay 16Oct 3186 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202681 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202691 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202680 ms
Jul 4, 202681 ms
Jul 11, 202680 ms
Jul 18, 202680 ms
Jul 25, 202681 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 8, 202685 ms
Aug 15, 202685 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202682 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202682 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202685 ms
Oct 10, 202684 ms
Oct 17, 202686 ms
Oct 24, 202686 ms
Oct 31, 202686 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

5 to fix78
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 78

    78/100

    Your mobile performance score is 78. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    740 ms · 138 KiB

    About 138 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 199 KiB

    About 199 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 69 KiB

    69 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    220 KiB

    3 images could be 220 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare CDN and Google Fonts and others), adding 316 KiB and 181 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 86 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    6 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 6 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 497 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Your largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Breaking new ground to advance science with the potential t…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.4 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 81 ms to 86 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Real visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 636 ms

    636 ms

    Real visitors wait 636 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 71 ms

    71 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 71 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix48
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    nov-14-2019-beam-0433-2.jpg weighs 34.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    33.8 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example nov-14-2019-beam-0433-2.jpg at 8,183 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 33.8 MB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (34.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (34.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.45 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.45 g of CO₂e: 54.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 41 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 41 requests on a phone: images 879 KiB (18), scripts 493 KiB (13) and stylesheets 143 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7778
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is long (93 characters)

    Your title is 93 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Breaking new ground to advance science with the potential to change lives | Beam Therapeu…”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 60 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 60 pages on beamtx.com and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Breaking new ground to advance science with the potential to change lives”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://beamtx.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://beamtx.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (313 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /jobs/saved-jobs, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 14 pages without a meta description

    /about-us, /science, /science/base-editing, /science/base-editing-applications, /science/presentations-and-publications and /pipeline and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix71
  • 2 broken links to your own pages

    2 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://beamtx.com/jobs/saved-jobs/ (500).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (beamtx.com).

  • Valid certificate (79 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for beamtx.com and is valid for another 79 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://beamtx.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    beamtx.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    beamtx.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 9 years old

    9 years

    beamtx.com was registered in Apr 2017 through Name106, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2029

    beamtx.com is registered until Apr 2029.

Content and conversion

6 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 240 words

    The homepage has only about 240 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Email authentication

2 to fix35
  • No DMARC policy

    beamtx.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 35/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_netblocks.mimecast.com include:eb1e9c.workshop-spf.net ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.4
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
42 open roles
Teams
Commercial Strategy (7), Quality (6), Legal (4), Finance (3)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Employees
479

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on beamtx.com, including 10 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25