Website review, no card needed

bellenzier.com.br logo

bellenzier.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202657 issues · 107 checks

This review found 57 issues worth fixing on bellenzier.com.br, 25 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.5 s4.7 sMay 9Oct 245.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.9 s
May 16, 20264.9 s
May 23, 20264.9 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.9 s
Jun 20, 20264.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20265.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.9 s
Jul 25, 20265.5 s
Aug 1, 20266.2 s
Aug 8, 20266.3 s
Aug 15, 20266.2 s
Aug 22, 20265.7 s
Aug 29, 20265.5 s
Sep 5, 20265.5 s
Sep 12, 20265.6 s
Sep 19, 20265.5 s
Sep 26, 20265.4 s
Oct 3, 20265.4 s
Oct 10, 20265.4 s
Oct 17, 20265.4 s
Oct 24, 20265.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
304 ms159 msMay 9Oct 24287 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026187 ms
May 16, 2026187 ms
May 23, 2026188 ms
May 30, 2026180 ms
Jun 6, 2026181 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026176 ms
Jun 27, 2026176 ms
Jul 4, 2026177 ms
Jul 11, 2026184 ms
Jul 18, 2026187 ms
Jul 25, 2026192 ms
Aug 1, 2026203 ms
Aug 8, 2026215 ms
Aug 15, 2026226 ms
Aug 22, 2026238 ms
Aug 29, 2026244 ms
Sep 5, 2026245 ms
Sep 12, 2026245 ms
Sep 19, 2026252 ms
Sep 26, 2026255 ms
Oct 3, 2026262 ms
Oct 10, 2026269 ms
Oct 17, 2026275 ms
Oct 24, 2026287 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bellenzier.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bellenzier.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. bellenzier.com.br at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. bellenzier.com.br at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. bellenzier.com.br at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. bellenzier.com.br at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. bellenzier.com.br at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. bellenzier.com.br at 7.6 s7.6 s
  8. bellenzier.com.br at 8.7 s8.7 s

bellenzier.com.br does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

13 to fix33
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    23 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 696 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    950 ms · 369 KiB

    5 images could be 369 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 393 KiB

    About 393 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 834 ms

    834 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 834 ms of main-thread work and 104 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    400 ms · 350 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (350 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 652 ms

    652 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 652 ms of main-thread work and 226 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 674 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    500 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 46 KiB

    About 46 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Real visitors wait 6.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Your largest element takes 8.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Busque pneus POR MEDIDA Vans e Utilitários Caminhão e Ônibu…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.7 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 19.1 s

    19.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 339 ms

    339 ms

    Real visitors wait 339 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 50% slower for real visitors

    +50%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 287 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 30 images without width and height

    30 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.9 s to 5.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 139 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 139 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (62), images 857 KiB (39) and stylesheets 362 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.89 g of CO₂e: 107.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

16 to fixGoogle 6981
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    3 dropdowns have no label.

  • ARIA roles used must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA roles used must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (6 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (2 elements)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 16 form fields without a label

    16 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 15 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10083
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.bellenzier.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 181 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 181 pages on bellenzier.com.br and 9 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 114 characters

    Your meta description is 114 characters: “Linha Completa de Pneus Pirelli, Passeio, Agro e Truck. Especialistas em Mecânica Corretiva e Preventiva, Confira!”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Bellenzier Pneus | Rede Oficial Pirelli - Compre Online”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,089 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 140 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token ','”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    161 of 162 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bellenzier.com.br/passeio/aro-16.html.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bellenzier.com.br).

  • Valid certificate (86 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for bellenzier.com.br and is valid for another 86 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bellenzier.com.br redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 47 links work

    All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors; 7 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bellenzier.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 24 years old

    24 years

    bellenzier.com.br was registered in Jul 2002. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    bellenzier.com.br's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    bellenzier.com.br is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 891 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 891 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Email authentication

2 to fix40
  • No DMARC policy

    bellenzier.com.br has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 40/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.locaweb.com.br -all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 1.11.0, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Magento
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
3l Cloud Internet Services Ltda Epp

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 57 issues on bellenzier.com.br, including 25 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25