Website review, no card needed

beniwood.com logo

beniwood.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202653 issues · 111 checks

This review found 53 issues worth fixing on beniwood.com, 23 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Live view · interaction off

Speed

12 to fix37
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.8 s · 2.3 MB

    149 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.5 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Maps and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 115 KiB

    About 115 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 764 ms

    764 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 764 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    600 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 600 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    578 KiB

    7 images could be 578 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Maps adds 418 ms

    418 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 418 ms of main-thread work and 716 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,307 HTML elements

    The page has 2,307 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix41
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.5 s

    22.5 s

    Your largest element takes 22.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.1 s

    28.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 28 images without width and height

    28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.024

    0.024

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.024, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 7.5 MB in 193 requests

    7.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.5 MB in 193 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (83), scripts 2.3 MB (66) and fonts 376 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    FOTOGRAMA-11-1-768x415.png weighs 518 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.11 g of CO₂e: 253.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7786
  • 69 text elements with low contrast

    69 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 18 tap targets too small

    18 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (179 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 179 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 54 links without text

    54 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (16 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7769
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (8 characters)

    Your title is only 8 characters: “Beniwood”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 76 internal links, 58 external

    The homepage links to 76 pages on beniwood.com and 58 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://beniwood.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://beniwood.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,303 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    /proyecto/diumenge-paella, /proyecto/casa, /proyecto/on-fire, /proyecto/who-i-am, /proyecto/la-cruz and /proyecto/elefantes-equilibrios and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    /proyecto/visitante, /proyecto/diumenge-paella, /proyecto/casa, /proyecto/on-fire, /proyecto/who-i-am and /proyecto/la-cruz and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    /proyecto/casa, /proyecto/on-fire, /proyecto/who-i-am, /proyecto/la-cruz, /proyecto/elefantes-equilibrios and /proyecto/leo-creciente and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 pages slow to respond

    /proyecto/on-fire, /proyecto/who-i-am, /proyecto/la-cruz, /proyecto/elefantes-equilibrios, /proyecto/leo-creciente and /proyecto/alexis and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 6987
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://beniwood.com/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure script 'http://beni…”.

  • 6 low-resolution images

    6 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

5 to fix61
  • 1 insecure resource on an https page

    1 resource load over plain http on your https page (for example http://beniwood.com/wp-content/plugins/woocommerce/assets/js/select2/select2.full.min.js?ver=4.0.3); browsers block or warn about them.

  • 10 broken links to your own pages

    10 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://beniwood.com/proyecto/les-7-llums/ (508).

  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example http://linkedin.com/in/albertoevangelio (999).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (beniwood.com).

  • Valid certificate (169 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2 verifies for beniwood.com and is valid for another 169 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://beniwood.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    beniwood.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    beniwood.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    beniwood.com was registered in Oct 2005 through Acens Technologies, S.L.U.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Oct 2027

    beniwood.com is registered until Oct 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 18 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,482 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,482 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

4 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 5 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

3 to fix25
  • No DMARC policy

    beniwood.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 redirect=spf.dominioabsoluto.net”.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 25/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
acens Technologies, S.L.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 53 issues on beniwood.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25