Website review, no card needed
berenice.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202662 issues · 115 checks
This review found 62 issues worth fixing on berenice.net, 27 of them high impact, across 115 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59F- #78,828 of 80,744 reviewed websitesbeats 2%
- #39,448 of 39,758 online storesbeats 1%
- #124 of 133 PrestaShop storesbeats 6%
Closest competitors among PrestaShop stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 184 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
64.2 s · 21.4 MB33 images could be 21.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 64.2 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.8 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.8 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.2 s · 407 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (407 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 35). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Vimeo and others), adding 24.0 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 237 ms
237 msVimeo costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 22.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 160 KiBAbout 160 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 595 ms
595 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 595 ms of main-thread work and 708 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 430 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 57 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 57 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors wait 4.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 10.3 s
10.3 sThe first text or image appears after 10.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 113.4 s
113.4 sYour largest element takes 113.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 16.4 s
16.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 115.8 s
115.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 115.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 239 ms
239 msReal visitors wait 239 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 38% slower for real visitors
+38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 960 ms
960 msReal visitors wait 960 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 49.5 MB in 166 requests
49.5 MBYour homepage downloads 49.5 MB in 166 requests on a phone: images 25.0 MB (44), other files 21.7 MB (67) and scripts 2.3 MB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
13 images over 500 KB
13 images weigh 17.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
28 images far larger than shown
16.4 MB28 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example apooka-sac-grand-modele-en-cuir-verni-chocolat-avec-chaine-d at 1,800 px wide, shown at 200 px. Resized copies would save about 16.4 MB.
13 images in older formats
13 images (12.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
18 images below the first screen load straight away
18 images further down the page (5.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 14.0 g of CO₂ per visit
14.02 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 14.02 g of CO₂e: 1682.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (8 characters)
Your title is only 8 characters: “BERENICE”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (ItemList, LocalBusiness, Organization and WebPage) but with 2 problems, for example “LocalBusiness: image is not an absolute URL ("/img/berenice-logo-17815061431.jpg")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
72 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 72 pages on berenice.net and 6 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 125 characters
Your meta description is 125 characters: “Découvrez tout l'univers de BERENICE, les collections Prêt à porter et accessoires pour femme sur le eshop BERENICE off…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://berenice.net/fr/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://berenice.net/sitemap-1-index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (229 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/fr/panier is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/fr and / all use the title “BERENICE”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
/fr/panier and /fr/861-voir-tout have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is /fr. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/ has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/fr/861-voir-tout took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 52 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “An error has been thrown while configuring your widget AbortError: signal is aborted without reason AbortError: signal …”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://www.berenice.tv/.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (berenice.net).
Valid certificate (45 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for berenice.net and is valid for another 45 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://berenice.net redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 46 links work
All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
berenice.net has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
berenice.net's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 25 years old
25 yearsberenice.net was registered in Aug 2001 through OVH sas. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Aug 2027
berenice.net is registered until Aug 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 173 words
The homepage has only about 173 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
berenice.net has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 35/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx include:cartsguru.io ip4:51.38.209.64 ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 1.11.0, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 62 issues on berenice.net, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.