Website review, no card needed
chesmar.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 104 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on chesmar.com, 20 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 279 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.2 s
2.8 s
3.3 s
3.9 s
4.4 s
chesmar.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
92.6 sThe page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 92.6 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused JavaScript
44.1 s · 8.5 MBAbout 8.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 44.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.5 s · 2.8 MB38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.8 MB).
Improve image delivery
7.0 s · 1.6 MB9 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Main-thread work: 14.6 s
A phone's processor spends 14.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Osano CMP and others), adding 2.6 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 615 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hubspot adds 247 ms
247 msHubspot costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 44 ms
44 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 44 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
36 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
28 KiB28 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 22.4 s
22.4 sThe first text or image appears after 22.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 95.8 s
95.8 sYour largest element takes 95.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Speed Index: 24.8 s
24.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 24.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 103.6 s
103.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 103.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.7 s
3.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 330 ms
330 msReal visitors wait 330 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.20
0.20For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 54% slower for real visitors
+54%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 279 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 568 ms
568 msReal visitors wait 568 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 20.5 MB in 420 requests
20.5 MBYour homepage downloads 20.5 MB in 420 requests on a phone: scripts 11.1 MB (130), images 5.5 MB (71) and other files 1.3 MB (177). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
hero_video_fallback.jpg weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
8 images far larger than shown
918 KiB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example hero_video_fallback.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 918 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (1.1 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (591 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit
5.80 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.80 g of CO₂e: 696.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
63 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 63 pages on chesmar.com and 10 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 102 characters
Your meta description is 102 characters: “Chesmar can build a beautiful new home for you in Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Your happier homelifeStarts here.”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Chesmar | New Construction & Move-In Home Builder in Texas”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.chesmar.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (668 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/blog has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
10 pages without a meta description
/chesmar-cares, /reviews, /careers, /blog, /why-buy-new and /financing and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
/blog, /texas/austin-new-homes, /texas/central-texas-new-homes, /texas/dallas-new-homes, /texas/houston-new-homes and /texas/san-antonio-new-homes have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/blog has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 4 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 small tap targets
4 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 30 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://www.chesmar.com/blog.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (chesmar.com).
Valid certificate (38 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for chesmar.com and is valid for another 38 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
http:// redirects to https
http://chesmar.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 40 links work
All 40 links checked from your homepage (33 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
chesmar.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
chesmar.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 21 years old
21 yearschesmar.com was registered in Apr 2005 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
chesmar.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 509 words of copy
The homepage carries about 509 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Top 5 Reasons to Buy a New Home”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Osano
A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Asn Flexential
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on chesmar.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.