Website review, no card needed

chesmar.com logo

chesmar.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 104 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on chesmar.com, 20 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
295 ms154 msMay 9Oct 24279 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026170 ms
May 16, 2026187 ms
May 23, 2026193 ms
May 30, 2026193 ms
Jun 6, 2026196 ms
Jun 13, 2026195 ms
Jun 20, 2026196 ms
Jun 27, 2026195 ms
Jul 4, 2026188 ms
Jul 11, 2026188 ms
Jul 18, 2026186 ms
Jul 25, 2026187 ms
Aug 1, 2026191 ms
Aug 8, 2026203 ms
Aug 15, 2026211 ms
Aug 22, 2026219 ms
Aug 29, 2026228 ms
Sep 5, 2026228 ms
Sep 12, 2026237 ms
Sep 19, 2026246 ms
Sep 26, 2026254 ms
Oct 3, 2026270 ms
Oct 10, 2026277 ms
Oct 17, 2026271 ms
Oct 24, 2026279 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of chesmar.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. chesmar.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. chesmar.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. chesmar.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. chesmar.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. chesmar.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. chesmar.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. chesmar.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  8. chesmar.com at 4.4 s4.4 s

chesmar.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix25
  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    92.6 s

    The page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 92.6 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    44.1 s · 8.5 MB

    About 8.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 44.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    8.5 s · 2.8 MB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    7.0 s · 1.6 MB

    9 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.9 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

  • Main-thread work: 14.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 14.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Osano CMP and others), adding 2.6 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 615 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Hubspot adds 247 ms

    247 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 44 ms

    44 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 44 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    36 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    28 KiB

    28 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 22.4 s

    22.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 22.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 95.8 s

    95.8 s

    Your largest element takes 95.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Speed Index: 24.8 s

    24.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 24.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 103.6 s

    103.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 103.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 330 ms

    330 ms

    Real visitors wait 330 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.20

    0.20

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 54% slower for real visitors

    +54%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 279 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 568 ms

    568 ms

    Real visitors wait 568 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 20.5 MB in 420 requests

    20.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.5 MB in 420 requests on a phone: scripts 11.1 MB (130), images 5.5 MB (71) and other files 1.3 MB (177). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    hero_video_fallback.jpg weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    918 KiB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example hero_video_fallback.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 918 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (1.1 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (591 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.80 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.80 g of CO₂e: 696.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8696
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9287
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 63 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 63 pages on chesmar.com and 10 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 102 characters

    Your meta description is 102 characters: “Chesmar can build a beautiful new home for you in Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Your happier homelifeStarts here.”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Chesmar | New Construction & Move-In Home Builder in Texas”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.chesmar.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (668 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 1 page without a title

    /blog has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 10 pages without a meta description

    /chesmar-cares, /reviews, /careers, /blog, /why-buy-new and /financing and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /blog, /texas/austin-new-homes, /texas/central-texas-new-homes, /texas/dallas-new-homes, /texas/houston-new-homes and /texas/san-antonio-new-homes have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /blog has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fix91
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 4 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 30 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://www.chesmar.com/blog.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (chesmar.com).

  • Valid certificate (38 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for chesmar.com and is valid for another 38 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://chesmar.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (33 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    chesmar.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    chesmar.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    chesmar.com was registered in Apr 2005 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    chesmar.com is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 509 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 509 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Top 5 Reasons to Buy a New Home”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Email authentication

1 to fix85
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Asn Flexential

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on chesmar.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25