Website review, no card needed
chesneys.co.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202654 issues · 116 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on chesneys.co.uk, 19 of them high impact, across 116 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #71,291 of 81,533 reviewed websitesbeats 11%
- #37,549 of 40,375 online storesbeats 6%
- #1,757 of 2,109 WooCommerce storesbeats 14%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 107 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 141 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
33.5 s · 9.3 MB140 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.3 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.3 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s47 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 53). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.5 s
A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, buildmyagent.io and Google CDN and others), adding 3.2 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 969 ms
969 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 969 ms of main-thread work and 931 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 597 KiB10 images could be 597 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
buildmyagent.io adds 622 ms
622 msbuildmyagent.io costs a phone 622 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
600 ms · 109 KiB109 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 143 KiBAbout 143 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
550 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).
Google CDN adds 470 ms
470 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 470 ms of main-thread work and 757 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 374 ms
374 msFacebook costs a phone 374 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 254 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 36 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.44
0.44For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.44 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 51.6 s
51.6 sYour largest element takes 51.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 15.6 s
15.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 52.0 s
52.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 52.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s
1.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 141 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 132 ms
132 msReal visitors wait 132 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.8 MB in 307 requests
12.8 MBYour homepage downloads 12.8 MB in 307 requests on a phone: images 8.0 MB (47), scripts 3.3 MB (142) and fonts 532 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Stove-banner-scaled.png weighs 2.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
15 images in older formats
15 images (3.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
17 images below the first screen load straight away
17 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.62 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.62 g of CO₂e: 434.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
7 tap targets too small
7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
16 links without text
16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (3 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h4 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
247 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 247 pages on chesneys.co.uk and 12 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 121 characters
Your meta description is 121 characters: “Chesneys is the leading brand in the luxury heating sector. Explore our luxury fireplaces, stoves & outdoor living rang…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “LUXURY FIREPLACES AND STOVES”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Chesneys: UK’s Luxury Fireplaces And Stoves Leading Supplier”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://chesneys.co.uk/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://chesneys.co.uk/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (974 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
8 pages without a meta description
/portfolio, /news, /category/outlet/fireside_outlet, /professionals, /resources and /contact-us and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /category/fireplaces/metamorphic-collection, whose canonical is /category/fireplaces/contemporary/metamorphic-collection. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
/portfolio and /news have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://chesneys.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/[email protected].
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
31 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (chesneys.co.uk).
Valid certificate (78 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for chesneys.co.uk and is valid for another 78 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://chesneys.co.uk redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 51 links work
All 51 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 11 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
chesneys.co.uk has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
chesneys.co.uk's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearschesneys.co.uk was registered in Feb 1998 through Team Blue Internet Services UK Limited t/a Team Blue Internet Services Limited t/a names.co.uk. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
chesneys.co.uk is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 473 words of copy
The homepage carries about 473 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BROCHURE DOWNLOAD” and “CONTACT US”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Start search” and “Register Grates”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Hotjar.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.uk.exclaimer.net include:spf.controlport.co.uk -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 54 issues on chesneys.co.uk, including 27 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.