Website review, no card needed
coallia.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202639 issues · 101 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on coallia.org, 15 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #35,363 of 80,626 reviewed websitesbeats 51%
- #20,632 of 39,666 online storesbeats 42%
- #580 of 2,104 WooCommerce storesbeats 68%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 93 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.0 s · 3.0 MB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.5 s · 1.5 MB12 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 67
67/100Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 673 KiBAbout 673 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 163 ms
163 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 163 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Matomo and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 867 KiB and 203 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 88 KiBAbout 88 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 89 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 260 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 105 ms
105 msYour server sent the HTML in 105 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Coallia : Mayotte terre de solidarité”.
Time to Interactive: 16.4 s
16.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.1 s
5.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 90 ms
90 msReal visitors wait 90 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 791 ms
791 msReal visitors wait 791 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 78% faster for real visitors
-78%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 20 ms
20 msScripts block the page for only 20 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
Gerard-Delacroix-scaled-aspect-ratio-324-324-scaled.jpg weighs 600 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
7 images far larger than shown
1.1 MB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Gerard-Delacroix-scaled-aspect-ratio-324-324-scaled.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 62 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 62 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (15), scripts 1.2 MB (24) and fonts 698 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images in older formats
11 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (1.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.10 g of CO₂e: 131.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “Accueil - Coallia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
104 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 104 pages on coallia.org and 11 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://coallia.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://coallia.org/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (720 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages without a meta description
/landing-dispositifs, /chiffres-cles, /produit/manuel-bagages, /archive/champs-dactivite, /archive/lassociation and /carrieres and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
/archive/champs-dactivite and /archive/lassociation have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
23 small tap targets
23 of 59 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
6 links through redirect chains
6 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://testaftam-cand.talent-soft.com/Pages/Offre/detailoffre.aspx?idOffre=9443&idOrigine=502&LCID=1036&offerReference=ass+admin-9443.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (coallia.org).
Valid certificate (19 days left)
The certificate from GoDaddy.com · GoDaddy TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 verifies for coallia.org and is valid for another 19 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://coallia.org redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 48 links work
All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
coallia.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
coallia.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 15 years old
15 yearscoallia.org was registered in May 2011 through NordNet SA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2032
coallia.org is registered until May 2032.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 363 words of copy
The homepage carries about 363 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be coallia.org is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:212.106.107.124 ip4:46.227.84.185 include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:hybride.coallia.org a:ftthsiege.coall…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 5.0.0; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 2 plugins are behind their latest release.contact-form-7 6.2 → 6.2.3 · woocommerce 11.1.2 → 11.2.1
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 5.0.0
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Hosting
- ISP and web hosting.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on coallia.org, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.