Website review, no card needed
codevidhya.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202649 issues · 111 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on codevidhya.com, 16 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #59,007 of 80,668 reviewed websitesbeats 23%
- #32,333 of 39,693 online storesbeats 15%
- #1,273 of 2,105 WooCommerce storesbeats 34%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 179 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.1 s · 981 KiBAbout 981 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.2 s · 293 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (293 KiB).
Font display
1.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.0 s).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 53). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce initial server response time
612 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 612 ms on a phone.
Document request latency
600 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 600 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Google CDN adds 311 ms
311 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 311 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 300 ms
300 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 512 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
tidio.co adds 82 ms
82 mstidio.co costs a phone 82 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 712 ms
712 msYour server takes 712 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 180 KiBAbout 180 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 178 KiB3 images could be 178 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 140 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.7 s
13.7 sYour largest element takes 13.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Coding Curriculum for Kids We mentor young learners to thri…”.
Time to Interactive: 24.4 s
24.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.4 s
11.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 298 ms
298 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 298 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 178 ms
178 msReal visitors wait 178 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.6 MB in 69 requests
4.6 MBYour homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 69 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (25), images 1.5 MB (12) and other files 361 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (109 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (32 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.30 g of CO₂e: 156.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “Coding For Kids - Codevidhya”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
7 H1 headlines
There are 7 <h1> headlines (“Coding Curriculum for Kids”, “800+” and “44+”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
66 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on codevidhya.com and 5 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://codevidhya.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://codevidhya.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,172 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/terms-of-use is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
7 pages without a meta description
/terms-of-use, /yearone-course, /yeartwo-courses, /yearten-course, /certification-courses and /python-pcap and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
/terms-of-use, /yearone-course, /yeartwo-courses, /yearten-course, /certification-courses and /python-pcap and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages slow to respond
/terms-of-use, /yearone-course, /yeartwo-courses, /yearten-course, /certification-courses and /python-pcap and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
8 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'querySelector')”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (codevidhya.com).
Valid certificate (84 days left)
The certificate from GlobalSign nv-sa · GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018 verifies for codevidhya.com and is valid for another 84 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://codevidhya.com redirects to the secure version.
All 40 links work
All 40 links checked from your homepage (35 internal, 5 external) answered without errors; 4 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
codevidhya.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
codevidhya.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 10 years old
10 yearscodevidhya.com was registered in Mar 2016 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2028
codevidhya.com is registered until Mar 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 599 words of copy
The homepage carries about 599 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Book A Free Class” and “Book a Free Class”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and “3,00,000+ Students”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Hotjar.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be codevidhya.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com include:sender.zoho-books.in ? include:_spf.google.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on codevidhya.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.