Website review, no card needed

codewizardshq.com logo

codewizardshq.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202634 issues · 87 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on codewizardshq.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.6 sMay 2Oct 172.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
176 ms133 msMay 2Oct 17171 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026150 ms
May 9, 2026149 ms
May 16, 2026148 ms
May 23, 2026147 ms
May 30, 2026144 ms
Jun 6, 2026143 ms
Jun 13, 2026139 ms
Jun 20, 2026138 ms
Jun 27, 2026145 ms
Jul 4, 2026145 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026143 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026144 ms
Aug 8, 2026145 ms
Aug 15, 2026154 ms
Aug 22, 2026160 ms
Aug 29, 2026170 ms
Sep 5, 2026171 ms
Sep 12, 2026167 ms
Sep 19, 2026169 ms
Sep 26, 2026169 ms
Oct 3, 2026164 ms
Oct 10, 2026171 ms
Oct 17, 2026171 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of codewizardshq.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. codewizardshq.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. codewizardshq.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. codewizardshq.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. codewizardshq.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. codewizardshq.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. codewizardshq.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. codewizardshq.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. codewizardshq.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 597 KiB

    About 597 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 86). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Intercom and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    620 ms · 138 KiB

    About 138 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 621 ms

    621 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 621 ms of main-thread work and 541 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 310 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (310 KiB).

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 300 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,850 HTML elements

    The page has 1,850 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 86 but mobile only 48. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    Your largest element takes 10.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “NEW TRACK — Artificial Intelligence. Master Python + AI. Th…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.0 s

    16.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 718 ms

    718 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 718 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 29% slower for real visitors

    +29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.012

    0.012

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.012, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.0 MB in 51 requests

    2.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 51 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (23), images 310 KiB (8) and fonts 202 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.57 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.57 g of CO₂e: 68.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9090
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (3 elements)

    <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (56 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 56 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 19 links without text

    19 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 35 links crawlers can't follow

    35 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 67 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 67 pages on codewizardshq.com and 13 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “Online coding classes for kids and teens ages 8-18. Enroll to learn real-world coding languages like Python, Java, HTML…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “NEW TRACK — Artificial Intelligence. Master Python + AI.”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Online Coding Classes for Kids and Teens - CodeWizardsHQ”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.codewizardshq.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.codewizardshq.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,069 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /ai-track and /python-language-track use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=56213751&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=51b40d25-5649-4323-ab12-1e9fd27a2855&bo=1&sid=47ca3960cd9411f1a431af173c288a94&vid=47ca61d0cd9411f1b29b75e1cbdd9788&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 2,029 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,029 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Try us, risk free”, “Pricing” and “Newsletter Subscribe”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 31 testimonial or review blocks, 10 customer or partner logos and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at codewizardshq.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on codewizardshq.com, including 19 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25