Website review, no card needed
codetantra.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202639 issues · 104 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on codetantra.com, 9 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 107 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
4.5 s
codetantra.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Font display
1.4 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).
Improve image delivery
750 ms · 712 KiB28 images could be 712 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64 (desktop: 69). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
760 ms · 145 KiBAbout 145 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 65 KiB65 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Google Analytics and others), adding 346 KiB and 213 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 24 KiBAbout 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
162 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (162 KiB).
Minify CSS
150 ms · 7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
68 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 243 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 439 ms
439 msYour server sent the HTML in 439 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sYour largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Exchanging Memorandum of Understanding between Chairman AIC…”.
First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s
3.4 sThe first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.4 s
5.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 109 ms to 107 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 106 ms
106 msReal visitors wait 106 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.095
0.095The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.095, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 151 ms
151 msScripts block the page for only 151 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.2 MB in 170 requests
5.2 MBYour homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 170 requests on a phone: images 4.7 MB (158), scripts 300 KiB (4) and HTML 102 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
39 images in older formats
39 images (2.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
33 images below the first screen load straight away
33 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
121 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Feb16-2021-MoU-between-AICTE-and-CodeTantra.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 294 px. Resized copies would save about 121 KiB.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.48 g of CO₂e: 177.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 162 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
36 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Your virtual university, in minutes!” and “Your virtual univ/school, in minutes!”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (554 characters)
Your meta description is 554 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.codetantra.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at codetantra.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
161 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 161 pages on codetantra.com and 4 external pages.
2 checks passed
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Teach & Learn Anywhere - CodeTantra”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://codetantra.com/.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (778 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages share a title
/, /123.jsp, /contact-us.jsp, /privacy-policy.jsp and /about-us.jsp all use the title “Teach & Learn Anywhere - CodeTantra”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
/buy.jsp, /python-programing-course-details.jsp, /java-course-details.jsp, /c-programing-course-details.jsp, /cpp-programing-course-details.jsp and /hadoop-course-details.jsp and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages share a meta description
/123.jsp, /contact-us.jsp, /privacy-policy.jsp and /about-us.jsp use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
11 pages without an H1
/123.jsp, /buy.jsp, /python-programing-course-details.jsp, /java-course-details.jsp, /c-programing-course-details.jsp and /cpp-programing-course-details.jsp and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/123.jsp has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
11 internal pages checked
We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
4 links through redirect chains
4 links go through two or more redirects, for example http://codetantra.com/?d=iitk.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (codetantra.com).
Valid certificate (76 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for codetantra.com and is valid for another 76 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://codetantra.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 41 links work
All 41 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 1 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
codetantra.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
codetantra.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 16 years old
16 yearscodetantra.com was registered in Feb 2010 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2031
codetantra.com is registered until Feb 2031.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 8 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 715 words of copy
The homepage carries about 715 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Get started”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 6 phone links and 2 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ip4:45.55.39.252 ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 39 issues on codetantra.com, including 14 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.