Website review, no card needed

drinksabe.com logo

drinksabe.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202630 issues · 75 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on drinksabe.com, 11 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s1.1 sMay 23Oct 311.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Oct 31, 20261.2 s

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of drinksabe.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. drinksabe.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. drinksabe.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. drinksabe.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. drinksabe.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. drinksabe.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. drinksabe.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. drinksabe.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. drinksabe.com at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

5 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    3.0 s · 1.2 MB

    15 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 378 KiB

    About 378 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 194 ms

    194 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 194 ms of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Optanon and others), adding 878 KiB and 414 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 67 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (67 KiB).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 160 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    32 KiB

    About 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    16 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 16 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 406 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix55
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    Your largest element takes 8.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “JIM ANDREWS | FOUNDER “For those times when only an actual …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.177

    0.177

    The layout shifts by 0.177 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 19.8 MB in 75 requests

    19.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.8 MB in 75 requests on a phone: media 16.6 MB (1), images 2.1 MB (32) and scripts 820 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    1.1 MB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example box-moscow-mule-no-shadow.webp at 1,200 px wide, shown at 77 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (450 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.60 g of CO₂e: 672.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8571
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Home - SABÉ Beverages”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 16 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 16 pages on drinksabe.com and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.drinksabe.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.drinksabe.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    54%

    The HTML your server sends has 270 of the 500 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.drinksabe.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://www.drinksabe.com/products, https://www.drinksabe.com/store-locator, https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/margarita, https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/moscow-mule, https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/mojito and https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/espresso-martini and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.drinksabe.com/products has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    https://www.drinksabe.com/products, https://www.drinksabe.com/store-locator, https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/margarita, https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/moscow-mule, https://www.drinksabe.com/cocktail/mojito and https://www.drinksabe.com/contact-us have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 9 internal pages checked

    We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 500 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 500 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE” and “Learn More”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Learn More” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at drinksabe.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WordPress.com

Company

Headquarters
Oakland

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on drinksabe.com, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25