Website review, no card needed
ecpay.com.ph website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202642 issues · 100 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on ecpay.com.ph, 15 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 141 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 143 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 171 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
ecpay.com.ph does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 308 KiBAbout 308 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.4 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).
Improve image delivery
750 ms · 7.8 MB46 images could be 7.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 151 KiBAbout 151 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 63). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 43 KiB43 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 194 ms
194 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 194 ms of main-thread work and 511 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
FontAwesome CDN adds 69 ms
69 msFontAwesome CDN costs a phone 69 ms of main-thread work and 490 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and Google Analytics), adding 1,001 KiB and 263 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 64 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
6 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 6 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 304 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 41.9 s
41.9 sYour largest element takes 41.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ecTransact Transact Now”.
Time to Interactive: 44.8 s
44.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 44.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.9 s
5.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 991 ms
991 msReal visitors wait 991 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
67 images without width and height
67 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.104
0.104The layout shifts by 0.104 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 182 ms
182 msReal visitors wait 182 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 35 ms
35 msScripts block the page for only 35 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.6 MB in 159 requests
13.6 MBYour homepage downloads 13.6 MB in 159 requests on a phone: images 11.6 MB (83), scripts 1.2 MB (58) and fonts 640 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
31 images far larger than shown
7.3 MB31 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example MANILAWATER.jpg at 3,000 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 7.3 MB.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 5.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
40 images in older formats
40 images (10.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
38 images below the first screen load straight away
38 images further down the page (10.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit
3.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.86 g of CO₂e: 463.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
80 images without alt text
80 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (5 characters)
Your title is only 5 characters: “ECPay”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (276 characters)
Your meta description is 276 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
48 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 48 pages on ecpay.com.ph and 7 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ecpay.com.ph/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ecpay.com.ph/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (587 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
/service-update, /ecpartners/ecbills, /ecpartners/eccash, /ecpartners/ecload, /ecpartners/ecpins and /ecpartners/eccashout and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/service-update has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/service-update has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://ecpay.com.ph/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection (404).
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://ecpayphhelpdesk.freshdesk.com/support/login.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (ecpay.com.ph).
Valid certificate (63 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for ecpay.com.ph and is valid for another 63 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://ecpay.com.ph redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
security.txt published
A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
ecpay.com.ph has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 11 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 542 words of copy
The homepage carries about 542 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Learn more”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 8 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal 10 (https://www.drupal.org)
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on ecpay.com.ph, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.