Website review, no card needed

fleaflicker.com logo

fleaflicker.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202634 issues · 80 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on fleaflicker.com, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
743 ms646 msApr 18Oct 3732 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 2026712 ms
Apr 25, 2026698 ms
May 2, 2026678 ms
May 9, 2026662 ms
May 16, 2026657 ms
May 23, 2026658 ms
May 30, 2026664 ms
Jun 6, 2026673 ms
Jun 13, 2026672 ms
Jun 20, 2026670 ms
Jun 27, 2026668 ms
Jul 4, 2026670 ms
Jul 11, 2026674 ms
Jul 18, 2026682 ms
Jul 25, 2026692 ms
Aug 1, 2026693 ms
Aug 8, 2026690 ms
Aug 15, 2026688 ms
Aug 22, 2026680 ms
Aug 29, 2026672 ms
Sep 5, 2026677 ms
Sep 12, 2026689 ms
Sep 19, 2026696 ms
Sep 26, 2026715 ms
Oct 3, 2026732 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
263 ms178 msApr 18Oct 3188 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026246 ms
Apr 25, 2026248 ms
May 2, 2026249 ms
May 9, 2026253 ms
May 16, 2026253 ms
May 23, 2026253 ms
May 30, 2026252 ms
Jun 6, 2026253 ms
Jun 13, 2026253 ms
Jun 20, 2026253 ms
Jun 27, 2026253 ms
Jul 4, 2026252 ms
Jul 11, 2026251 ms
Jul 18, 2026250 ms
Jul 25, 2026249 ms
Aug 1, 2026248 ms
Aug 8, 2026247 ms
Aug 15, 2026247 ms
Aug 22, 2026247 ms
Aug 29, 2026245 ms
Sep 5, 2026240 ms
Sep 12, 2026232 ms
Sep 19, 2026214 ms
Sep 26, 2026197 ms
Oct 3, 2026188 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of fleaflicker.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. fleaflicker.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. fleaflicker.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. fleaflicker.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. fleaflicker.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. fleaflicker.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. fleaflicker.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. fleaflicker.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. fleaflicker.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix58
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.8 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 524 KiB

    About 524 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 273 KiB

    About 273 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 119 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (119 KiB).

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.3 MB and 173 ms of main-thread time.

  • cloudfront.net adds 73 ms

    73 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 73 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 95 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    18 KiB

    1 image could be 18 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 88 but mobile only 58. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 145 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Your largest element takes 9.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The All-In-One Toolkit for Running Your Fantasy Football Le…”.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 78 ms

    78 ms

    Real visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 414 ms

    414 ms

    Real visitors wait 414 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 246 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 13 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.37 g of CO₂e: 43.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 14 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 14 requests on a phone: scripts 853 KiB (3), stylesheets 295 KiB (2) and images 87 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 6682
  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h4 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 27 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10088
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.fleaflicker.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 36 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on fleaflicker.com and 4 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Fleaflicker offers fast, easy, powerful and free fantasy sports. Enjoy fantasy football with live scoring, stats, dynas…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The All-In-One Toolkit for Running Your Fantasy Football League.”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Free Fantasy Football Leagues · NFL”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (748 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /terms has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /terms has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 10079
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://d1h60c43tcq0zx.cloudfront.net/static/css/global-70524bd76901e00c4ad8302caf4a4381.c…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 705 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 705 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up for Free”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Sign Up for Free” and “Contact/Report a bug”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at fleaflicker.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Company

Founded
2005

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on fleaflicker.com, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25