forefront.se website review

2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.2 MB).

8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, hsappstatic.net and Hubspot and others), adding 10.7 MB and 488 ms of main-thread time.

website-files.com costs a phone 182 ms of main-thread work and 10.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

Your mobile performance score is 73. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

About 154 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

About 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 69 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Your largest element takes 5.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The page becomes fully interactive after 8.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The layout shifts by 0.106 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 90 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 10.8 MB in 66 requests on a phone: media 9.7 MB (6), scripts 699 KiB (29) and images 203 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.07 g of CO₂e: 368.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (15 elements).

1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

The homepage links to 119 pages on forefront.se and 18 external pages.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /erbjudande/ai, whose canonical is /ai. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

forefront.se has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 743 words of visible text.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.