Website review, no card needed
ftec.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202659 issues · 109 checks
This review found 59 issues worth fixing on ftec.com.br, 26 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
49FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 263 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 257 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 288 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
16.7 s · 5.4 MB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.4 MB).
Improve image delivery
14.9 s · 4.7 MB17 images could be 4.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.2 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 9
9/100Your mobile performance score is 9. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 599 ms
599 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 599 ms of main-thread work and 829 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 343 ms
343 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 343 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 34 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 263 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 41.6 s
41.6 sYour largest element takes 41.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Banner CPA”.
Time to Interactive: 42.3 s
42.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 42.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.2 s
14.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.911
0.911The layout shifts by 0.911 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 992 ms
992 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 992 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 305 ms
305 msReal visitors wait 305 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 964 ms
964 msReal visitors wait 964 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 263 ms to 288 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.6 MB in 228 requests
9.6 MBYour homepage downloads 9.6 MB in 228 requests on a phone: images 5.6 MB (29), scripts 3.3 MB (50) and other files 497 KiB (143). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
image_2026-10-21_172449246_1792614290307.png weighs 1.5 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images in older formats
2 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
105 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Site C_pia de Frontlight Sa_de e est_tica _1684 x 504 px_ _P at 1,688 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 105 KiB.
About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit
2.72 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.72 g of CO₂e: 326.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
10 buttons without a name
10 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
25 text elements with low contrast
25 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (11 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Uniftec Online”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at unifteconline.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
24 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 24 pages on ftec.com.br and 5 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 122 characters
Your meta description is 122 characters: “Invista em você! Escolha os cursos da Uniftec Online. Técnico EAD. Graduação EAD. Pós-Graduação EAD. Cursos Livres Onli…”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.unifteconline.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (347 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /politica-de-privacidade, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
10 pages share a title
/, /minha-conta, /carrinho, /cursos, /cursos-agrupados and /blog/uniftec-apresenta-projeto-de-inovacao-aeroespacial-em-reuniao-com-presidente-da-infraero and 4 others all use the title “Uniftec Online”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages share a meta description
/minha-conta, /carrinho, /cursos, /cursos-agrupados, /blog/uniftec-apresenta-projeto-de-inovacao-aeroespacial-em-reuniao-com-presidente-da-infraero and /blog/uniftec-participa-de-missao-territorios-inovadores-em-sao-paulo-e-campinas and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
8 pages without an H1
/minha-conta, /carrinho, /cursos-agrupados, /blog/uniftec-apresenta-projeto-de-inovacao-aeroespacial-em-reuniao-com-presidente-da-infraero, /blog/uniftec-participa-de-missao-territorios-inovadores-em-sao-paulo-e-campinas and /blog/professora-e-estudante-do-colegio-polyuni-representam-a-instituicao-em-mostra-cientifica-no-ceara and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 pages with very little text
/minha-conta, /carrinho, /cursos, /cursos-agrupados, /blog and /blog/uniftec-apresenta-projeto-de-inovacao-aeroespacial-em-reuniao-com-presidente-da-infraero and 4 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 11 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
52 of 61 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.unifteconline.com.br/politica-de-privacidade (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (unifteconline.com.br).
Valid certificate (124 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for ftec.com.br and is valid for another 124 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://ftec.com.br redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
unifteconline.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
unifteconline.com.br's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 9 years old
9 yearsunifteconline.com.br was registered in Jul 2017. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2027
unifteconline.com.br is registered until Jul 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 564 words of copy
The homepage carries about 564 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ftec.com.br is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:smtp.vtexcrm.com.br include:amazonses.com include:_spf.rdstation.com.…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 59 issues on ftec.com.br, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.