Website review, no card needed

graphite.com logo

graphite.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202632 issues · 98 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on graphite.com, 12 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s3.1 sMay 2Oct 173.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.8 s
May 9, 20263.8 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
227 ms160 msMay 2Oct 17197 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026219 ms
May 9, 2026210 ms
May 16, 2026201 ms
May 23, 2026197 ms
May 30, 2026195 ms
Jun 6, 2026197 ms
Jun 13, 2026196 ms
Jun 20, 2026191 ms
Jun 27, 2026185 ms
Jul 4, 2026183 ms
Jul 11, 2026183 ms
Jul 18, 2026181 ms
Jul 25, 2026181 ms
Aug 1, 2026174 ms
Aug 8, 2026172 ms
Aug 15, 2026168 ms
Aug 22, 2026178 ms
Aug 29, 2026179 ms
Sep 5, 2026184 ms
Sep 12, 2026180 ms
Sep 19, 2026188 ms
Sep 26, 2026186 ms
Oct 3, 2026206 ms
Oct 10, 2026206 ms
Oct 17, 2026197 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of graphite.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. graphite.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. graphite.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. graphite.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. graphite.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. graphite.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. graphite.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. graphite.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. graphite.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

graphite.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix40
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 663 KiB

    About 663 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 315 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (315 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40 (desktop: 56). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 1.2 MB and 809 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 530 ms

    530 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 530 ms of main-thread work and 843 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • 2,138 HTML elements

    The page has 2,138 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 236 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    154 KiB

    5 images could be 154 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.9 s

    17.9 s

    Your largest element takes 17.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Thumbnail for Graphite features video”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.1 s

    21.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 216 ms

    216 ms

    Real visitors wait 216 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 219 ms to 197 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 572 ms

    572 ms

    Real visitors wait 572 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 21.0 MB in 119 requests

    21.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 21.0 MB in 119 requests on a phone: media 18.0 MB (2), scripts 1.8 MB (54) and fonts 788 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 5.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.95 g of CO₂e: 713.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9193
  • 20 tap targets too small

    20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Canonical points to another host

    Your canonical URL points to staging-graphite-splash.vercel.app, not graphite.com, so Google may credit that host instead.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 35 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 35 pages on graphite.com and 17 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 71 characters

    Your meta description is 71 characters: “Graphite helps teams on GitHub deliver higher quality software, faster.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The next generation of code review.”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “Graphite - Code review for the age of AI”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://staging-graphite-splash.vercel.app/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (606 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 9 pages share a meta description

    /blog/cursor-cloud-agents, /customers, /customer/ramp, /customer/asana, /customer/tecton and /features/chat and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /docs, whose canonical is /docs/get-started. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /customers, /pricing and /features have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://graphite.com/stacking.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (graphite.com).

  • Valid certificate (119 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for graphite.com and is valid for another 119 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://graphite.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 31 links work

    All 31 links checked from your homepage (22 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    graphite.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    graphite.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 31 years old

    31 years

    graphite.com was registered in May 1995 through Amazon Registrar, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    graphite.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 590 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 590 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up” and “Get started for free”.

  • 15 calls to action

    The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact” and “Sign up”.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
4 open roles
Teams
Engineering (4)
Job board
ashby

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on graphite.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25