Website review, no card needed

greenedgecycling.com logo

greenedgecycling.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202646 issues · 109 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on greenedgecycling.com, 21 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s4.2 sMay 2Oct 174.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.7 s
May 9, 20264.4 s
May 16, 20264.4 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.6 s
Jun 6, 20264.8 s
Jun 13, 20265.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.9 s
Jun 27, 20265.0 s
Jul 4, 20265.1 s
Jul 11, 20265.2 s
Jul 18, 20265.6 s
Jul 25, 20265.4 s
Aug 1, 20265.6 s
Aug 8, 20265.4 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Aug 22, 20265.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.8 s
Sep 5, 20264.7 s
Sep 12, 20264.7 s
Sep 19, 20264.4 s
Sep 26, 20264.4 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.4 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
113 ms96 msMay 2Oct 17104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026104 ms
May 9, 2026104 ms
May 16, 2026105 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026110 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026107 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026100 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026100 ms
Sep 26, 202698 ms
Oct 3, 202699 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix47
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.0 s · 6.2 MB

    154 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.5 s

    66 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.8 s · 418 KiB

    About 418 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Mailchimp and iubenda and others), adding 1.4 MB and 746 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    803 KiB

    About 803 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 418 ms

    418 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 418 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    379 KiB

    7 images could be 379 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,813 HTML elements

    The page has 1,813 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    141 KiB

    141 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Real visitors wait 5.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.0 s

    20.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Your largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Team Jayco Alula”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 451 ms

    451 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 451 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 7.6 MB in 187 requests

    7.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.6 MB in 187 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (31), scripts 1.9 MB (69) and stylesheets 605 KiB (64). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (715 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (279 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.16 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.16 g of CO₂e: 259.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8090
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Positive tabindex

    2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (46 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 46 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 40 links without text

    40 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h1 → h3 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7780
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Trending now” and “Men's Team”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 7 links crawlers can't follow

    7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 61 internal links, 63 external

    The homepage links to 61 pages on greenedgecycling.com and 63 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Team Jayco Alula – 15th year UCI WorldTour Team”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://greenedgecycling.com/2026/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://greenedgecycling.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (462 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 10 pages share 5 titles

    /2026/2025partners and /2024/2025partners all use the title “Partners 2026 – Team Jayco Alula”, and 4 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /2026/2025partners, /2026/category/news-2, /2026/2025mens-team, /2026/2025womens-team, /2026/2025menscontinentalteam and /2026/2025womenscontinentalteams and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /2024/2025partners, whose canonical is /2026/2025partners. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    /2026/2025partners, /2026/category/news-2, /2026/2025mens-team, /2026/2025womens-team, /2026/2025menscontinentalteam and /2026/2025womenscontinentalteams and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 7 pages with very little text

    /2026/2025mens-team, /2026/2025womens-team, /2026/2025menscontinentalteam, /2026/2025womenscontinentalteams, /2024/2025womenscontinentalteams and /2024/2025mens-team and 1 other have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    /2026/2025mens-team, /2026/2025womens-team, /2026/2025menscontinentalteam, /2026/2025womenscontinentalteams, /2026/2025continentalstaff and /2024/category/news-2 and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9271
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://greenedgecycling.com/2026/.

  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix71
  • 2 broken links to your own pages

    2 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://greenedgecycling.com/privacy-policy/ (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (greenedgecycling.com).

  • Valid certificate (72 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for greenedgecycling.com and is valid for another 72 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://greenedgecycling.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    greenedgecycling.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    greenedgecycling.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    greenedgecycling.com was registered in Sep 2010 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2027

    greenedgecycling.com is registered until Sep 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 294 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 294 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Learn more”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Subscribe” and “Contact Us”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be greenedgecycling.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.armada.it -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 6.4.13; the current release is 7.1.3.
  • 8 plugins are behind their latest release.instagram-feed 6.6.1 → 6.14.0 · sportspress 2.7.17 → 2.7.31 · woocommerce 8.6.4 → 11.2.1 · woo-smart-quick-view 3.5.7 → 4.4.2 · ti-woocommerce-wishlist 2.8.0 → 2.13.0 · elementor 3.19.2 → 4.3.5 · feeds-for-youtube 2.1.4 → 2.10.0 · mailchimp-for-wp 4.9.11 → 4.14.1

Stack

CMS
WordPress 6.4.13
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Adelaide

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 46 issues on greenedgecycling.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25