Website review, no card needed

guardian.com.sg logo

guardian.com.sg website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202661 issues · 108 checks

This review found 61 issues worth fixing on guardian.com.sg, 30 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.5 s4.9 sMay 16Oct 315.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.6 s
May 23, 20265.8 s
May 30, 20265.8 s
Jun 6, 20265.9 s
Jun 13, 20266.0 s
Jun 20, 20266.1 s
Jun 27, 20266.2 s
Jul 4, 20266.3 s
Jul 11, 20266.3 s
Jul 18, 20266.4 s
Jul 25, 20266.3 s
Aug 1, 20266.2 s
Aug 8, 20265.7 s
Aug 15, 20265.2 s
Aug 22, 20265.1 s
Aug 29, 20265.4 s
Sep 5, 20265.8 s
Sep 12, 20266.2 s
Sep 19, 20266.3 s
Sep 26, 20266.2 s
Oct 3, 20265.9 s
Oct 10, 20265.9 s
Oct 17, 20265.9 s
Oct 24, 20265.8 s
Oct 31, 20265.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
667 ms208 msMay 16Oct 31261 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026276 ms
May 23, 2026272 ms
May 30, 2026263 ms
Jun 6, 2026268 ms
Jun 13, 2026275 ms
Jun 20, 2026282 ms
Jun 27, 2026287 ms
Jul 4, 2026291 ms
Jul 11, 2026293 ms
Jul 18, 2026291 ms
Jul 25, 2026293 ms
Aug 1, 2026291 ms
Aug 8, 2026283 ms
Aug 15, 2026294 ms
Aug 22, 2026344 ms
Aug 29, 2026487 ms
Sep 5, 2026614 ms
Sep 12, 2026549 ms
Sep 19, 2026434 ms
Sep 26, 2026330 ms
Oct 3, 2026290 ms
Oct 10, 2026280 ms
Oct 17, 2026277 ms
Oct 24, 2026267 ms
Oct 31, 2026261 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of guardian.com.sg (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. guardian.com.sg at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. guardian.com.sg at 2.8 s2.8 s
  3. guardian.com.sg at 4.2 s4.2 s
  4. guardian.com.sg at 5.6 s5.6 s
  5. guardian.com.sg at 7.0 s7.0 s
  6. guardian.com.sg at 8.5 s8.5 s
  7. guardian.com.sg at 9.9 s9.9 s
  8. guardian.com.sg at 11.3 s11.3 s

guardian.com.sg does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

15 to fix4
  • Improve image delivery

    56.0 s · 11.3 MB

    33 images could be 11.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 56.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    9.3 s · 1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.7 s · 1.1 MB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.7 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.7 s.

  • Main-thread work: 11.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 11.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 4

    4/100

    Your mobile performance score is 4. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,293 HTML elements

    The page has 3,293 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and ZenDesk and others), adding 2.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 672 ms

    672 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 672 ms of main-thread work and 831 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 86 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 86 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 528 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 270 ms

    270 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 270 ms of main-thread work and 449 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 170 ms

    170 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 170 ms of main-thread work and 428 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • aiqua.in adds 94 ms

    94 ms

    aiqua.in costs a phone 94 ms of main-thread work and 363 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 76 ms

    76 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 76 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    160 ms · 21 KiB

    21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Real visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.21

    1.21

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.21 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.73

    1.73

    The layout shifts by 1.73 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 98.6 s

    98.6 s

    Your largest element takes 98.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “✕ Button Button”.

  • Speed Index: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 99.5 s

    99.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 99.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 345 ms

    345 ms

    Real visitors wait 345 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 276 ms to 261 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.6 s to 5.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 467 ms

    467 ms

    Real visitors wait 467 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix26
  • Page weight: 19.1 MB in 297 requests

    19.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.1 MB in 297 requests on a phone: images 14.6 MB (102), scripts 4.0 MB (69) and other files 505 KiB (120). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    LPSB-B3-C-And-C-App-Anniversary-15Octto21Oct2026.gif weighs 2.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    2.0 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example LPSB-B3-C-And-C-App-Anniversary-15Octto21Oct2026.gif at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 2.0 MB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (2.4 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    LPSB-B3-C-And-C-App-Anniversary-15Octto21Oct2026.gif is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (163 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.41 g of CO₂e: 648.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 7285
  • 12 buttons without a name

    12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Images must have alternative text (6 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 47 text elements with low contrast

    47 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    46 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 26 tap targets too small

    26 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 52 links without text

    52 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8358
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (25 characters)

    Your title is only 25 characters: “Guardian Online Singapore”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://guardian.com.sg/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 8 links crawlers can't follow

    8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 742 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8585
  • 53 small tap targets

    53 of 156 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Creating a worker from 'blob:https://guardian.com.sg/80c07e50-8486-4ba9-9c95-f4adc097c257' violates the following Conte…”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Requests the geolocation permission on page load

    Requests the geolocation permission on page load.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (guardian.com.sg).

  • Valid certificate (82 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for guardian.com.sg and is valid for another 82 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://guardian.com.sg redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    guardian.com.sg has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    guardian.com.sg's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    guardian.com.sg was registered in May 1997 through Singnet Pte Ltd. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    guardian.com.sg is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 742 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 742 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy More Save More” and “Buy 1 Free 1”.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:210.3.169.51/32 ip4:111.203.175.32/27 ip4:118.143.132.209/32 ip4:116.12.249.68/32 ip4:116.12.249.67/32 ip4:…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 58 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 58 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

E-commerce
Magento
Hosting
Fastly

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 61 issues on guardian.com.sg, including 26 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25