Website review, no card needed
guardian.com.sg website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202661 issues · 108 checks
This review found 61 issues worth fixing on guardian.com.sg, 30 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
49F- #80,444 of 80,572 reviewed websitesbeats 0%
- #39,618 of 39,629 online storesbeats 0%
- #597 of 601 Magento storesbeats 0%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 276 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 272 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 344 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 487 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 614 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 549 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 434 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 261 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.8 s
4.2 s
5.6 s
7.0 s
8.5 s
9.9 s
11.3 s
guardian.com.sg does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
56.0 s · 11.3 MB33 images could be 11.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 56.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
9.3 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.7 s · 1.1 MB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.7 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.7 s.
Main-thread work: 11.4 s
A phone's processor spends 11.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 4
4/100Your mobile performance score is 4. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,293 HTML elements
The page has 3,293 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and ZenDesk and others), adding 2.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 672 ms
672 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 672 ms of main-thread work and 831 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 86 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 86 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 528 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 270 ms
270 msFacebook costs a phone 270 ms of main-thread work and 449 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ZenDesk adds 170 ms
170 msZenDesk costs a phone 170 ms of main-thread work and 428 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
aiqua.in adds 94 ms
94 msaiqua.in costs a phone 94 ms of main-thread work and 363 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 76 ms
76 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 76 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
160 ms · 21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 1.21
1.21For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.21 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.73
1.73The layout shifts by 1.73 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 98.6 s
98.6 sYour largest element takes 98.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “✕ Button Button”.
Speed Index: 18.2 s
18.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 99.5 s
99.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 99.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s
2.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 345 ms
345 msReal visitors wait 345 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 276 ms to 261 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.6 s to 5.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 467 ms
467 msReal visitors wait 467 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.1 MB in 297 requests
19.1 MBYour homepage downloads 19.1 MB in 297 requests on a phone: images 14.6 MB (102), scripts 4.0 MB (69) and other files 505 KiB (120). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
LPSB-B3-C-And-C-App-Anniversary-15Octto21Oct2026.gif weighs 2.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
2.0 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example LPSB-B3-C-And-C-App-Anniversary-15Octto21Oct2026.gif at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 2.0 MB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (2.4 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
LPSB-B3-C-And-C-App-Anniversary-15Octto21Oct2026.gif is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (163 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit
5.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.41 g of CO₂e: 648.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
12 buttons without a name
12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Images must have alternative text (6 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
47 text elements with low contrast
47 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
46 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
26 tap targets too small
26 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
52 links without text
52 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “Guardian Online Singapore”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://guardian.com.sg/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
8 links crawlers can't follow
8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 742 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
53 small tap targets
53 of 156 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Creating a worker from 'blob:https://guardian.com.sg/80c07e50-8486-4ba9-9c95-f4adc097c257' violates the following Conte…”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (guardian.com.sg).
Valid certificate (82 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for guardian.com.sg and is valid for another 82 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://guardian.com.sg redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
guardian.com.sg has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
guardian.com.sg's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsguardian.com.sg was registered in May 1997 through Singnet Pte Ltd. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
guardian.com.sg is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 742 words of copy
The homepage carries about 742 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy More Save More” and “Buy 1 Free 1”.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:210.3.169.51/32 ip4:111.203.175.32/27 ip4:118.143.132.209/32 ip4:116.12.249.68/32 ip4:116.12.249.67/32 ip4:…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
58 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 58 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Hosting
- Fastly
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 61 issues on guardian.com.sg, including 26 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.