Website review, no card needed
h-o.co.il website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202648 issues · 102 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on h-o.co.il, 16 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 14.7 MB in 289 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69D- #68,772 of 80,587 reviewed websitesbeats 13%
- #36,270 of 39,638 online storesbeats 7%
- #400 of 601 Magento storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
h-o.co.il does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
8,012 HTML elements
The page has 8,012 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.5 s
A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 7.3 MB99 images could be 7.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 49). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.1 MB and 698 ms of main-thread time.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 616 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 511 ms
511 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 511 ms of main-thread work and 865 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
492 KiBAbout 492 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 30 KiBAbout 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
218 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (218 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 478 ms
478 msYour server sent the HTML in 478 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 18.1 s
18.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 206 ms
206 msReal visitors wait 206 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors
+28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.0 s
5.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sYour largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “חצאית עם תחרה אמיליה”.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.7 MB in 289 requests
14.7 MBYour homepage downloads 14.7 MB in 289 requests on a phone: images 12.5 MB (126), scripts 1.1 MB (18) and other files 899 KiB (138). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
19 images far larger than shown
895 KiB19 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5100211944_4.jpg at 900 px wide, shown at 182 px. Resized copies would save about 895 KiB.
40 images in older formats
40 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
5434_HO_70_640X6404.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (103 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit
4.17 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.17 g of CO₂e: 500.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (5 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
44 tap targets too small
44 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Positive tabindex
2 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 72 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
290 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 290 pages on h-o.co.il and 3 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “מגלים את הקולקציות של H&O: אופנת נשים, גברים וילדים, הלבשה תחתונה, מצעים, מגבות וטקסטיל לבית. מגוון מותגים, סטייל לכל ה…”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “H&O אופנה לנשים, גברים וילדים וטקסטיל לבית|”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.h-o.co.il/media/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
/privacy, /store-locator and /contact have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
12 pages with very little text
/144343-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/144351-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%92%D7%95%D7%93, /144343-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/144351-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%92%D7%95%D7%93/144697-%D7%97%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%98%D7%99-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D, /144343-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/144351-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%92%D7%95%D7%93/144423-%D7%92-%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9D, /144343-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/144351-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%92%D7%95%D7%93/144430-%D7%97%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%A6%D7%95%D7%AA, /144343-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/144351-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%92%D7%95%D7%93/144429-%D7%9E%D7%9B%D7%A0%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D and /144343-%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%9D/144351-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%92%D7%95%D7%93/144426-%D7%A1%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%92%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%93%D7%99%D7%92%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%9D and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 124 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://ams46.creativecdn.com/info?tk=J6-p1nUuZB6l6GHX6s0O6O9ZCYxfazYIP7w5xCyT5dVP9G5Pt5Z3elgJm7jsuOEUYfCK3wCKSqPsmagSaFfiHgA.
45 small tap targets
45 of 126 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://www.clarity.ms/tag/qfavvtsjl5?ref=gtm2' violates the following Content Security Policy dire…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (h-o.co.il).
Valid certificate (37 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for h-o.co.il and is valid for another 37 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://h-o.co.il redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 43 links work
All 43 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 3 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
1 checks passed
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only pki.goog, ssl.com, comodoca.com and digicert.com to issue certificates for h-o.co.il, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 99 words
The homepage has only about 99 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
34 short forms
34 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:62.219.65.177 ip4:188.165.37.18 ip4:51.68.66.236 ip4:46.105.63.76 ip4:185.53.210.33 ip4:80.179.241.8 ip4:141…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Xandr (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on h-o.co.il, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.