Website review, no card needed

hartman.fi logo

hartman.fi website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202640 issues · 103 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on hartman.fi, 16 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.3 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.0 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
207 ms175 msMay 2Oct 17196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026179 ms
May 9, 2026183 ms
May 16, 2026186 ms
May 23, 2026186 ms
May 30, 2026188 ms
Jun 6, 2026189 ms
Jun 13, 2026190 ms
Jun 20, 2026195 ms
Jun 27, 2026198 ms
Jul 4, 2026200 ms
Jul 11, 2026197 ms
Jul 18, 2026193 ms
Jul 25, 2026191 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026192 ms
Aug 15, 2026192 ms
Aug 22, 2026194 ms
Aug 29, 2026195 ms
Sep 5, 2026199 ms
Sep 12, 2026203 ms
Sep 19, 2026202 ms
Sep 26, 2026203 ms
Oct 3, 2026198 ms
Oct 10, 2026195 ms
Oct 17, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of hartman.fi (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. hartman.fi at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. hartman.fi at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. hartman.fi at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. hartman.fi at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. hartman.fi at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. hartman.fi at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. hartman.fi at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. hartman.fi at 5.0 s5.0 s

hartman.fi does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

11 to fix42
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 305 KiB

    About 305 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 177 KiB

    About 177 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 9,183 HTML elements

    The page has 9,183 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 6.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 78 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (78 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, videoly.co and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 720 KiB and 652 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 429 ms

    429 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 429 ms of main-thread work and 528 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 20 KiB

    20 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 283 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    57 KiB

    5 images could be 57 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.9 s

    14.9 s

    Your largest element takes 14.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Syystarjouksia Hartmanilta KUUKAUDEN TARJOUSLEHTI”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 670 ms

    670 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 670 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 462 ms

    462 ms

    Real visitors wait 462 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.21

    0.21

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.21 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 179 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 390 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 390 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (269), images 788 KiB (61) and stylesheets 220 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (170 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.74 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.74 g of CO₂e: 88.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9195
  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 87 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8370
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 94 links crawlers can't follow

    94 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Title is short (19 characters)

    Your title is only 19 characters: “Rautakauppa Hartman”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 855 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 855 pages on hartman.fi and 8 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Hartman logo”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.hartman.fi/media/sitemap_fi.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,008 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    /fi/stores/store/redirect/___store/sv/___from_store/fi/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaGFydG1hbi5maS9zdi8~, /fi/english, /sv/danish, /fi/yhteystiedot, /fi/tuotemerkki and /fi/rautakauppa and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    307 of 338 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.hartman.fi/fi/stores/store/redirect/___store/sv/___from_store/fi/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaGFydG1hbi5maS9zdi8~/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (hartman.fi).

  • Valid certificate (82 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for hartman.fi and is valid for another 82 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://hartman.fi redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    hartman.fi has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 35 years old

    35 years

    hartman.fi was registered in Dec 1990. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    hartman.fi's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

  • Registered until Aug 2027

    hartman.fi is registered until Aug 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,434 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,434 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 45 short forms

    45 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 19 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf1.hartman.fi include:spf2.hartman.fi include:spf3.hartman.fi -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Magento
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 40 issues on hartman.fi, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25