Website review, no card needed

hellobody.fr logo

hellobody.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202630 issues · 80 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on hellobody.fr, 11 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s855 msMay 23Nov 7917 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 2026948 ms
May 30, 2026943 ms
Jun 6, 2026929 ms
Jun 13, 2026924 ms
Jun 20, 2026910 ms
Jun 27, 2026913 ms
Jul 4, 2026916 ms
Jul 11, 2026942 ms
Jul 18, 2026970 ms
Jul 25, 2026950 ms
Aug 1, 2026956 ms
Aug 8, 2026950 ms
Aug 15, 2026937 ms
Aug 22, 2026931 ms
Aug 29, 2026885 ms
Sep 5, 2026878 ms
Sep 12, 2026880 ms
Sep 19, 2026885 ms
Sep 26, 2026932 ms
Oct 3, 2026895 ms
Oct 10, 2026910 ms
Oct 17, 2026872 ms
Oct 24, 2026943 ms
Oct 31, 2026984 ms
Nov 7, 2026917 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
125 ms92 msMay 23Nov 7118 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 2026103 ms
Jun 27, 2026109 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026113 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026109 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 202697 ms
Sep 5, 202697 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202699 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026106 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026108 ms
Oct 24, 2026120 ms
Oct 31, 2026121 ms
Nov 7, 2026118 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of hellobody.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. hellobody.fr at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. hellobody.fr at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. hellobody.fr at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. hellobody.fr at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. hellobody.fr at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. hellobody.fr at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. hellobody.fr at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. hellobody.fr at 5.6 s5.6 s

Speed

8 to fix54
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 375 KiB

    About 375 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.4 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Clarity and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 5.5 MB and 742 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 44 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (44 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 494 ms

    494 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 494 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Shopify adds 39 ms

    39 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 39 ms of main-thread work and 4.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    200 ms · 241 KiB

    7 images could be 241 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    140 ms · 33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    Your largest element takes 14.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.5 s

    16.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Real visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 408 ms

    408 ms

    Real visitors wait 408 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 189 ms

    189 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 189 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 7.9 MB in 202 requests

    7.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 202 requests on a phone: media 4.4 MB (6), other files 1.1 MB (82) and images 1.1 MB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    52 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Hellobody_splash_page_offer_1.jpg at 1,440 px wide, shown at 314 px. Resized copies would save about 52 KiB.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 267.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8691
  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is long (82 characters)

    Your title is 82 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “HelloBody - The Clean Beauty Community – HelloBody - The Clean Beauty Community FR”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 117 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 117 pages on hellobody.fr and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “Pour nous, glamour rime avec naturel et responsabilité. C'est pourquoi nous offrons des soins cosmétiques naturels et n…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://hellobody.fr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://hellobody.fr/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://hellobody.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (624 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://hellobody.fr/collections/all, https://hellobody.fr/collections/normal-to-dry, https://hellobody.fr/collections/dehydrated, https://hellobody.fr/collections/combination-to-oily, https://hellobody.fr/collections/cleansers-toners and https://hellobody.fr/collections/serums-oils-1 and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://hellobody.fr/collections/all, https://hellobody.fr/collections/normal-to-dry, https://hellobody.fr/collections/dehydrated, https://hellobody.fr/collections/combination-to-oily, https://hellobody.fr/collections/cleansers-toners and https://hellobody.fr/collections/serums-oils-1 and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 256 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 256 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at hellobody.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 5 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Judge Me Reviews · Microsoft Clarity · cloudfront.net · shopjar.io · mulwi.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on hellobody.fr, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25