Website review, no card needed

horosimansi.com logo

horosimansi.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202629 issues · 77 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on horosimansi.com, 7 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.5 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Oct 31, 20261.5 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
297 ms192 msMay 23Nov 7250 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026204 ms
May 30, 2026211 ms
Jun 6, 2026222 ms
Jun 13, 2026233 ms
Jun 20, 2026242 ms
Jun 27, 2026233 ms
Jul 4, 2026240 ms
Jul 11, 2026241 ms
Jul 18, 2026243 ms
Jul 25, 2026240 ms
Aug 1, 2026237 ms
Aug 8, 2026237 ms
Aug 15, 2026238 ms
Aug 22, 2026247 ms
Aug 29, 2026252 ms
Sep 5, 2026258 ms
Sep 12, 2026253 ms
Sep 19, 2026258 ms
Sep 26, 2026257 ms
Oct 3, 2026261 ms
Oct 10, 2026278 ms
Oct 17, 2026281 ms
Oct 24, 2026285 ms
Oct 31, 2026270 ms
Nov 7, 2026250 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of horosimansi.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. horosimansi.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. horosimansi.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. horosimansi.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. horosimansi.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. horosimansi.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. horosimansi.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. horosimansi.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. horosimansi.com at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

7 to fix71
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • 3,551 HTML elements

    The page has 3,551 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 179 KiB

    About 179 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 81 KiB

    About 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 439 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Shopify), adding 310 KiB and 74 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    63 KiB

    5 images could be 63 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    8 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 80 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Your largest element takes 5.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 364 ms

    364 ms

    Real visitors wait 364 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 250 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.102

    0.102

    The layout shifts by 0.102 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 435 ms

    435 ms

    Real visitors wait 435 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 195 ms

    195 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 195 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 127 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 127 requests on a phone: images 810 KiB (16), other files 665 KiB (62) and scripts 524 KiB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    ChatGPT_Image_May_5_2026_06_44_32_PM_800x.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (23 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.63 g of CO₂e: 76.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 10096
  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (11 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 64 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10085
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (248 characters)

    Your meta description is 248 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 268 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 268 pages on horosimansi.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Χωροσήμανση - Μέσα Ατομικής Προστασίας & Πινακίδες Σήμανσης”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.horosimansi.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.horosimansi.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (639 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.horosimansi.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.horosimansi.com/collections/%CF%89%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%B1%CF%83%CF%80%CE%AF%CE%B4%CE%B5%CF%82, https://www.horosimansi.com/collections/%CF%83%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%8D%CF%86%CE%BF%CE%B9-%CF%83%CE%B5%CF%86 and https://www.horosimansi.com/collections/%CF%80%CE%B1%CE%BD%CF%84%CE%B5%CE%BB%CF%8C%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%B1-%CF%83%CE%B5%CF%86 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.horosimansi.com/collections/%CE%BC%CE%AC%CF%83%CE%BA%CE%B5%CF%82-%CF%86%CE%AF%CE%BB%CF%84%CF%81%CE%B1, whose canonical is https://www.horosimansi.com/collections/%ce%bc%ce%ac%cf%83%ce%ba%ce%b5%cf%82-%cf%86%ce%af%ce%bb%cf%84%cf%81%ce%b1. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    73 of 74 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 287 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 287 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Sign Up”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 6 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at horosimansi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Mobile App Builder · Hulk Product Options · Judge Me Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Scala Discounts · justuno.com · makeprosimp.com · conversionbear.com · hextom.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Roberta

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on horosimansi.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25