Website review, no card needed
imagina.pe website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202653 issues · 105 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on imagina.pe, 22 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 186 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 227 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.5 s
5.4 s
6.3 s
7.2 s
imagina.pe does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.8 s51 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 902 KiBAbout 902 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 360 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (360 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.1 s
A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
3.1 MB6 images could be 3.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (hsappstatic.net, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
610 ms · 170 KiBAbout 170 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.
hsappstatic.net adds 637 ms
637 mshsappstatic.net costs a phone 637 ms of main-thread work and 727 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
460 ms · 100 KiB100 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 498 ms
498 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 498 ms of main-thread work and 368 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 436 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 260 ms
260 msFacebook costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 224 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Minify CSS
10 ms · 16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 24 ms
24 msYour server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.8 s
23.8 sYour largest element takes 23.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Este sitio web almacena cookies en tu PC, las cuales se uti…”.
Time to Interactive: 27.1 s
27.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.7 s
12.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 228 ms
228 msReal visitors wait 228 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors
+20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 227 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.13
0.13The layout shifts by 0.13 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Real-user TTFB: 771 ms
771 msReal visitors wait 771 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 26.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
23.8 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example FOTO-FACHADA.jp-ultimog.jpeg at 10,112 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 23.8 MB.
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 182 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 182 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (26), scripts 2.3 MB (72) and stylesheets 321 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images in older formats
7 images (27.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (3.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.92 g of CO₂e: 230.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is short (42 characters)
Your meta description is only 42 characters: “Web oficial del grupo inmobiliario Imagina”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
88 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 88 pages on imagina.pe and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Inmobiliaria Imagina - Departamentos en Lima”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.imagina.pe/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.imagina.pe/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (545 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /store, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 page without a meta description
/campana-inversionistas has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 pages share a meta description
/proyectos-lima, /bono-verde, /referidos-imagina, /compramos-tu-terreno, /quienes-somos and /servicio-al-cliente and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
/campana-inversionistas has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/campana-inversionistas has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.imagina.pe/store/ (500).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://www.resguarda.com/etica.imagina.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (imagina.pe).
Valid certificate (64 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for imagina.pe and is valid for another 64 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
http:// redirects to https
http://imagina.pe redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
imagina.pe has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 412 words of copy
The homepage carries about 412 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be imagina.pe is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.masterbase.com include:amazonses.com include:outbound.mailhop.org…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 7.1.3; the current release is 7.1.4.
- 3 plugins are behind their latest release.header-footer-elementor 2.9.5 → 2.9.6 · ays-popup-box 6.4.4 → 6.4.5 · wp-expand-tabs-free 3.1.7 → 3.1.8
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on imagina.pe, including 26 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.