Website review, no card needed

infosec.co.th logo

infosec.co.th website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202641 issues · 84 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on infosec.co.th, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of infosec.co.th (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. infosec.co.th at 1.9 s1.9 s
  2. infosec.co.th at 3.9 s3.9 s
  3. infosec.co.th at 5.8 s5.8 s
  4. infosec.co.th at 7.8 s7.8 s
  5. infosec.co.th at 9.7 s9.7 s
  6. infosec.co.th at 11.7 s11.7 s
  7. infosec.co.th at 13.6 s13.6 s
  8. infosec.co.th at 15.5 s15.5 s

Speed

8 to fix86
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Font display

    1.3 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.3 s).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    260 ms · 928 KiB

    About 928 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 86

    86/100

    Your mobile performance score is 86. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Maps and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.8 MB and 758 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 459 ms

    459 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 459 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 202 ms

    202 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 202 ms of main-thread work and 480 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    260 ms · 64 KiB

    About 64 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 112 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    77 KiB

    3 images could be 77 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    19 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (19 KiB).

  • Minify CSS

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix94
  • Time to Interactive: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 44 images without width and height

    44 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 172 ms

    172 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 172 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix40
  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 2.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    1.3 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example adf77b191095bb6df1ab602941645368.png at 1,672 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (2.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 97 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 97 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (21), other files 353 KiB (2) and images 258 KiB (63). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.75 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.75 g of CO₂e: 89.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8388
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (6 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 32 images without alt text

    32 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 23 links without text

    23 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 6960
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “INFOSEC • Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://infosec.co.th/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 17 links with vague text

    17 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 49 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 49 pages on infosec.co.th and 5 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://infosec.co.th/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://infosec.co.th/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (346 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix73
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://infosec.co.th/th/home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 4 pages share a title

    /, https://infosec.co.th/th/home, https://infosec.co.th/en and https://infosec.co.th/th all use the title “INFOSEC • Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://infosec.co.th/th/home, https://infosec.co.th/th/about-us, https://infosec.co.th/th/blog/category/service, https://infosec.co.th/th/category, https://infosec.co.th/th/blog/category/news and https://infosec.co.th/th/contact and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    https://infosec.co.th/th/home, https://infosec.co.th/th/about-us, https://infosec.co.th/th/blog/category/service, https://infosec.co.th/th/category, https://infosec.co.th/th/blog/category/news and https://infosec.co.th/th/contact and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://infosec.co.th/th/about-us, https://infosec.co.th/th/blog/category/service and https://infosec.co.th/th/contact have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://infosec.co.th/th/home and https://infosec.co.th/th/category took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9684
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://infosec.co.th/.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    53 of 59 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 497 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 497 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “CONTACT US” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (7 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at infosec.co.th, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
dragonhispeed

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on infosec.co.th, including 12 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25