Website review, no card needed

Inspectify logo

inspectify.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202634 issues · 87 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on inspectify.com, 13 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for Inspectify

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.4 sMay 2Oct 171.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.5 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
110 ms76 msMay 2Oct 17106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202687 ms
May 9, 202682 ms
May 16, 202680 ms
May 23, 202683 ms
May 30, 202684 ms
Jun 6, 202689 ms
Jun 13, 202694 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202693 ms
Jul 4, 202685 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202685 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202687 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202698 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of inspectify.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. inspectify.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. inspectify.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. inspectify.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. inspectify.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. inspectify.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. inspectify.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. inspectify.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. inspectify.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.3 s · 5.3 MB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 678 KiB

    About 678 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (enzuzo.com, Facebook and website-files.com and others), adding 6.9 MB and 854 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 50). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • website-files.com adds 125 ms

    125 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 125 ms of main-thread work and 5.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 150 KiB

    10 images could be 150 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 68 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 68 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 122 ms

    122 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 122 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Maps adds 115 ms

    115 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 115 ms of main-thread work and 384 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 150 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    97 KiB

    About 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.9 s

    17.9 s

    Your largest element takes 17.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Inspections & Valuations finally in sync. We capture the da…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.9 s

    17.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 210 ms

    210 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 210 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 470 ms

    470 ms

    Real visitors wait 470 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 7.3 MB in 85 requests

    7.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 85 requests on a phone: media 4.4 MB (2), scripts 1.7 MB (27) and images 943 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    39 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 641ba4eb8875d5060333d586_Home Rehab.webp at 1,412 px wide, shown at 332 px. Resized copies would save about 39 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (78 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.07 g of CO₂e: 248.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8391
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 53 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 53 pages on inspectify.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Inspectify is a property inspection platform that leverages proprietary technology and a network of home inspectors to …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Inspections & Valuations finally in sync.”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Simplifying Property and Home Inspections - Inspectify”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.inspectify.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.inspectify.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (534 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.inspectify.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 12 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.inspectify.com/solutions, https://www.inspectify.com/products/inspection-services, https://www.inspectify.com/products/inspection-report, https://www.inspectify.com/products/valuation-services, https://www.inspectify.com/products/rehab-tool and https://www.inspectify.com/products/home-energy-report and 6 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.inspectify.com/inspections/property-management and https://www.inspectify.com/inspections/commercial use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.inspectify.com/get-started has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 446 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 446 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Get started” and “Get in touch”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 28 testimonial or review blocks and 7 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at inspectify.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on inspectify.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25